The Scream by Edvard Munch, 1893 version at the National Museum of Norway

Attribution · analysis · art history

Is The Scream by Van Gogh? Munch, origin and analysis

No: The cry is by Edvard Munch. But the confusion reveals a real relationship between two artists who made color, line and landscape the instruments of an inner emotion.

Verdict: Edvard Munch, 1893
Van Gogh died in 1890The first Scream dates from 18934 colored versionsOslofjord seen from Ekeberg

Article verified on July 14, 2026 · Sources: MUNCH, Nasjonalmuseet and Van Gogh Museum.

Immediate response

The painting is not by Van Gogh - and this detail changes his entire reading

Assigning the work correctly is not about reciting a name. This places the image in Norse symbolism, the Friesland cycle of life, and Munch's personal research into anxiety.

Edvard Munch creates the first painted version of the Scream in 1893. Vincent van Gogh died on July 29, 1890, almost three years earlier. The chronology is therefore sufficient to exclude attribution, but it does not cancel any relationship between the artists.

Munch, born in 1863, discovered Van Gogh's work around 1890 and became a deep admirer of the Dutch painter. The two men probably never met. However, they share a modern ambition: to no longer use color to only imitate the visible world, but to make an inner experience perceptible.

Contemporary confusion also comes from our way of grouping famous images. The spirals of Starry Night, the yellow skies of Van Gogh and the red curves of Scream have become symbols of "emotional" painting. However, their techniques, their trajectories and their subjects remain distinct.

1853

Birth of Van Gogh

Vincent was born in the Netherlands and began his artistic career late.

1863

Birth of Munch

Edvard Munch was born in Norway, ten years after Van Gogh.

1890

Death of Van Gogh

Munch discovered his work around this period and admired it.

1892

The text and Despair

The experience of landscape first takes shape in a poem and a preparatory motif.

1893

The cry

The frontal silhouette replaces the man in profile and makes the image immediately universal.

Before the image, text

A walk, a red sky and "an infinite cry through nature"

The motif was not born from an improvised gesture in front of the canvas. Munch wrote it, drew it, took it up and transformed it for several years.

The Scream of Munch with the Ekeberg road, the fjord and the red sky
The place is recognizable: a road on Ekeberg hill dominates the fjord and the town of Kristiania, today Oslo.

In a text dated 1892, Munch recounts a walk with two friends at sunset. The sky turns blood red, the city and the fjord appear blue-black, the friends continue on their way while the artist stops, trembling with anguish. He doesn't just say that a character lets out a cry: he feels a cry crossing nature.

This nuance explains the central ambiguity. The figure opens its mouth, but it also brings its hands to its ears. It can scream, hear the cry of the landscape, or become the sounding board of a sensation that abolishes the boundary between human beings and the world.

In 1892, Munch painted Despair, with an identifiable man wearing a hat and coat. The landscape, the two walkers and the undulating sky are already present. In 1893, the figure turned around in front of the viewer and lost age, gender and social identity. It is this radical simplification which gives the motif its power.

"My friends continued, and I stood there, trembling with anguish - I felt the loud cry in nature."Edvard Munch, text of the Cree, 1892 - synthetic translation

Anatomy of an icon

How Munch transforms a real landscape into a sound wave

The strength of the painting comes from a simple opposition: the road and the balustrade resist, while the sky, the water and the body begin to undulate.

01

The diagonal of the bridge

The balustrade starts from the foreground and suddenly flees towards the two walkers. It draws the eye in depth but also isolates the face, stuck against the edge.

02

The frontal figure

Neither a precise portrait nor realistic anatomy, it resembles a mask, a skull or an embryo. This indeterminacy allows each spectator to project themselves into it.

03

The two friends

They continue to walk, straight and almost indifferent. Their stability makes the solitude of the character more acute, who can no longer follow the ordinary rhythm.

04

The red sky

Orange bands do not accurately describe a sunset. They take the form of flames or waves and give a physical color to the alarm.

05

The blue-black fjord

The curve of the water follows that of the sky and the face. Nature is no longer a setting behind emotion: it participates in the same movement.

06

The cardboard visible

The technique seems quick and fragile. Reserves, lines and thin surfaces reveal the support, which keeps the image in a state of emergency.

Full detail of Edvard Munch's Scream showing its undulating lines

Is the character really screaming?

The French title encourages this reading, but Munch's text shifts the action towards the environment. Hands on ears suggest that he is trying to protect himself from an external or internal cry. The work remains open: it is precisely this refusal to decide which allows him to represent anxiety without visible cause.

A pattern, not a single canvas

Four colorful versions and one image multiplied by the print

Munch often used his patterns. Differences in support, color and line make Scream a living series rather than an original followed by copies.

1893

Painting of Nasjonalmuseet

Tempera and grease pencil on cardboard

Considered the first painted version; given to the museum by Olaf Schou in 1910.

1893

Drawing kept in MUNCH

Pencil on cardboard

A graphic version that shows the pattern's ability to work with drier material.

1895

Pastel in private collection

Pastel on cardboard

Colorful version accompanied by a variation of the text on its frame.

around 1910

Painting preserved in MUNCH

Tempera and oil on unprepared cardboard

This version was stolen in 2004 and then found in 2006; it remains extremely fragile.

1895

Lithograph

Black and white printing, sometimes colored

Around thirty proofs are estimated. The printed rehearsal prepared the way for the worldwide distribution of the motif.

Why are the versions running at MUNCH? Cardboard, paper and pigments are sensitive to light, humidity and oxygen. The museum alternately exhibits a painting, drawing or lithograph while the others rest in the dark.

True kinship

Van Gogh and Munch: same expressive urgency, two pictorial languages

They are often brought together because they have moved painting from appearance to experience. But one models the world through matter, the other simplifies it to the sign.

The Starry Night by Vincent van Gogh, blue sky animated by whirlwinds
Vincent van Gogh · 1853 -1890

Matter makes nature active

In Van Gogh, impasto, directional touches and complementary contrasts give the sky, cypresses or fields visible energy. Painting retains a strong material presence: each brushstroke remains an event.

Anxiety of Edvard Munch, head-on crowd under an undulating sky
Edvard Munch · 1863 -1944

The line transforms the world into a symbol

Munch often favors silhouettes, flat areas and continuous curves. Face, sky and shore become elements of the same emotional alphabet. The image seems simple because it eliminates any detail that does not serve the psychic state.

Which brings them together

  • A non-naturalistic color used to express intensity.
  • A landscape that reflects or amplifies the inner state.
  • Self-portraits used as a laboratory of technique and identity.
  • An interest in universal themes: solitude, love, death, consolation and nature.
  • A major influence on the expressionists of the 20th century.

What sets them apart

  • Van Gogh belongs to post-impressionism; Munch comes from symbolism and becomes a pioneer of expressionism.
  • Van Gogh's thick, fragmented touch differs from Munch's large curves and flatter surfaces.
  • Van Gogh often works in front of an observed motif; Munch takes images from memory for a long time.
  • The Scream place a sign figure in the center; Van Gogh's landscapes can carry emotion without character.
  • Munch had a long career until 1944; Van Gogh's focused on a decade.

Three visual dialogues to observe

Edvard Munch Anxiety, Tight Characters in the Foreground
Crowd and isolation

Anxiety

The sky of Scream returns above a head-on crowd. Close faces create no community: isolation becomes collective.

Van Gogh's Night Café in red and green
Uncomfortable color

The Night Café

Van Gogh contrasts red and green to produce an oppressive atmosphere. Emotion arises here from a social interior rather than a sign figure.

The Sick Child by Edvard Munch, intimate and self-effacing scene
Memory and loss

The Sick Child

The rubbed and recaptured surface not only describes a chamber. It shows the fragmentary nature of a painful memory.

Self-portrait with bandaged ear by Vincent van Gogh
Represent yourself after the crisis

Bandaged ear self-portrait

Van Gogh does not paint a disorderly explosion: he presents himself standing, concentrated, affirming through work the continuity of his identity as an artist.

Vampire by Edvard Munch, two entwined figures
Love and threat

Vampire

The embrace can be consoling or predatory. As in The cry, Munch constructs an open image whose title directs without exhausting the meaning.

Road with a Cypress and a Star by Vincent van Gogh
The landscape as rhythm

Road with cypress and star

The road, the cypress and the sky are all driven by curves. But Van Gogh retains the density of the place and the resistance of the painted material.

Five keys to comparing without confusing

1. Color no longer fills objects

In both works, color ceases to be mere descriptive information. The sky of Scream isn't red just because the sun sets: it becomes a warning layer that runs across the entire scene. In Starry Night, deep blue and luminous yellows construct a nocturnal space animated by contrasts. Munch tends towards large continuous, almost emblematic areas; Van Gogh fragments the surfaces into touches which preserve the trace of the hand. An intense palette therefore brings them together, but its implementation reveals two different thoughts.

2. Rhythm organizes emotion

Perhaps the most fruitful resemblance lies in movement. The curves of the sky, the fjord and the figure respond to each other in Munch like the swirls of the sky, the branches and the hills in Van Gogh. However, the Scream contrast these undulations with the dry diagonal of the footbridge: space seems to be torn between order and panic. Van Gogh distributes his rhythm more often throughout the landscape. At home, the gaze circulates; at Munch, he suddenly returns to the central face and his defensive gesture.

3. Support is part of the meaning

The 1893 version of the Scream combines tempera and grease pencil on cardboard whose fragility is today decisive for conservation. The thin areas and visible lines give the image a dry tension, very different from the impastos associated with Van Gogh. This frequently constructs a relief of paint that catches the light and makes the surface almost tactile. A convincing reproduction must respect this difference: it should not automatically transform Munch into thick paint or smooth Van Gogh's directional touch.

4. Biography is not a total explanation

Popular stories readily bring the two artists together through psychological suffering. This reading can open a door, but it becomes misleading if it reduces the paintings to symptoms. Munch designed, took up and distributed his motif for years; Van Gogh studied prints, color theory, old masters and innovations of his time. Their expressiveness comes from conscious work on composition, format, color and series. Their expressiveness comes from conscious work on composition, format, color and series. Their expressiveness comes from conscious work on composition, format, color and series. Seeing only the crisis makes the method, visual culture and technical decisions disappear which give the works their lasting power.

5. Influence is not an encounter

Munch and Van Gogh probably never met. The Norwegian nevertheless discovered his elder's work around 1890 and admired it, at the very moment when his own painting was moving away from naturalism. He does not copy a precise painting: he recognizes in Van Gogh the possibility of using landscape and color as vehicles for an inner experience. The history of art often advances in this way, through delayed gaze, exhibition, reproduction and memory. Their relationship is therefore real without making their styles interchangeable.

What this comparison changes

An exact attribution does not destroy the intuition that brought people together The cry by Van Gogh; she makes it more precise. We understand that modern expression does not have a single grammar. It can arise from matter and touch, or from simplification and symbol; inhabiting a landscape without character or concentrating in a frontal silhouette. Comparing then amounts to observing how each artist transforms a sensation into a visual construction, rather than looking for which one would have painted the most tormented image.

Unravel the truth from the spectacular

Four preconceived ideas that prevent us from seeing the picture

Tormented biographies attract, but they do not replace chronology or analysis of forms.

False

"Van Gogh painted The Scream"

Munch is the author. The Nasjonalmuseet version dates from 1893, three years after Van Gogh's death.

Too simple

"The character screams"

He can also cover his ears in the face of the cry of nature. The 1892 text deliberately maintains this ambiguity.

Inaccurate

"There is only one original"

Munch produced four colored versions and a lithograph. Repetition is part of his practice, as for several reasons in the Frieze of Life.

Reducer

"Madness explains genius"

The image is the result of prolonged work: text, sketches, Despair, figure changes and technical repetitions. Suffering does not replace artistic construction.

An almost invisible inscription, "Can only have been painted by a madman", appears in the sky of the 1893 version. Infrared imaging and graphological analysis confirmed in 2020 that it was added by Munch himself- even, probably after a hostile public reaction.

See The Scream in Oslo

Two museums, several versions and closely monitored conservation

The motif can be seen at the National Museum and MUNCH. Always check the hanging, as works on paper and cardboard must be protected from light.

Nasjonalmuseet · Oslo

The painted version from 1893

The first painted version is presented in the room dedicated to Munch, unless ready or necessary for conservation. It was stolen in 1994 then recovered the same year. Its fragile support requires low lighting.

Consult the official sheet
MUNCH · Bjørvika

Painting, drawing and lithographs

MUNCH retains eight completed versions: a painting, a drawing and six lithographs. One version is still on display in the presentation Infinite, while the others rest in the dark according to a rotation system.

See exhibition conditions

Frequently asked questions

The Scream, Van Gogh and Munch: precise answers

Attribution, meaning, versions and exhibition locations.

Was The Scream painted by Van Gogh?
No. The cry is a motif by Edvard Munch. The first painted version dates from 1893, while Vincent van Gogh died in July 1890.
Why is The Scream often attributed to Van Gogh?
Both artists use expressive color, lively lines and emotionally charged landscapes. The fame of Starry Night strengthens the association, but their styles and contexts are different.
How many versions of The Scream are there?
Munch created four colorful versions: two tempera paintings and two pastel or pencil drawings. He also created a lithograph in 1895, known from several prints.
Who is the character depicted in The Scream?
He is not identified. His silhouette has no clearly defined age, gender or social status. This indeterminacy gives it a universal scope and allows the viewer to project themselves into it.
Does the character scream or cover his ears?
Both readings are possible. Munch's text evokes a cry passing through nature; hands on ears suggest that the figure can hear it and seek to protect itself from it.
Where can we see The Scream today?
An 1893 version is kept at the Nasjonalmuseet in Oslo. MUNCH has a painting, a drawing and six lithographs; a version is still visible there, according to a protective rotation system.
Did Munch know Van Gogh?
Munch discovered and admired Van Gogh's work around 1890, but the two artists probably never met. There are parallels and general influence, not collaboration.
Which painting to choose between The Scream and Starry Night?
Choose The cry for a frontal, graphic and tense image; Starry Night for a blue landscape, punctuated by material. Consider the palette, orientation and desired atmosphere in the room.

Main sources

The right name doesn't close your eyes: it opens the right story.

The cry belongs to Munch. The comparison with Van Gogh then becomes more interesting, because it concerns two distinct ways of giving visible form to intensity.

Explore the works of Edvard Munch

0 comments

Leave a comment

Please note that comments must be approved before they are published.