A tiny manifesto of the look
Rembrandt's Pisseuse: daily subject, etching and reception
In 1631, Rembrandt engraved a peasant woman crouching at the foot of a tree. The traditional title is raw, the scale almost intimate and the technique extraordinarily concentrated: a work of 8 centimeters which forces us to look at what proper art usually leaves off-camera.
Immediate response
What does this little print actually show?
A common woman crouched in the relative shelter of a tree, while turning her head as if afraid of surprise. The French title consecrated, The Pisser, translates the old "Woman Making Water". However, modern records are not entirely unambiguous: the British Museum describes defecation and the Rijksmuseum indexes both urination and defecation.
Most reliable formulation: the work depicts a woman relieving herself in the open air. The historical title is preserved because it identifies the print in the catalogs, but this title should not be transformed into anatomical certainty. The visual essential lies in posture, vigilance of the gaze and the contrast between the banality of the act and the acute attention of the engraver.
Landmarks
From observation to controversy
Tiny figures
Rembrandt engraves beggars, passers-by and street figures in very small formats.
The Stamp Couple
The Woman Who Pisses and The pissing man share subject, date and close dimensions.
The plate is evolving
The New Hollstein distinguishes two states of the female figure and several states of the male counterpart.
Moral rejection
Some cataloguists have difficulty supporting that an image deemed vulgar is really by Rembrandt.
The look reevaluated
Museums study it as an explicit observation of the body, the street and social conventions.
Composition
A collected body, a look that overflows
The silhouette is packed into the lower half of the image. The knees apart, the fabrics stacked and the arm placed on the thigh make up a triangular mass. On the left, the tree forms a vertical screen; on the right, the field remains almost empty. on the right, the field remains almost empty. This void gives direction to the turned face.
Rembrandt does not treat the woman as an anecdote hidden in a vast landscape. He places her in the foreground, alone, at a distance that makes the situation uncomfortably readable. The spectator occupies precisely the space towards which she look. Hence comes the tension: the image not only shows a private act, it constructs the possibility of being seen.
The headdress, apron, sleeves and heavy pleats are not used to idealize. They identify a rural or popular figure, without providing a biography. "Peasant" is a social type in ancient notices; it is not the name of a known model.
The states
Two tests, a reworked plate
An etching is not a single image in the sense of one painting. The copper plate can be bitten, printed, reworked and then printed again. Each lasting phase constitutes a "state". For this work, the New Hollstein distinguishes two. The British Museum proof is described as a second state "with the plate reworked".
Not to be confused: the "state" describes a modification of the matrix, while the "proof" designates a printed sheet. Two proofs of the same condition may vary. This distinction explains why the older Bartsch and Hollstein catalogs do not don't always cut out the history of the plate like the New Hollstein.
The male counterpart
Two gestures, two relationships with public space
The British Museum considers that the two prints were probably thought of as pendants. They are almost the same height, share the year 1631 and isolate a character against a poorly developed background. The comparison, however, reveals an asymmetry.
The man remains standing, backpacking, camped on his legs. His jet visibly crosses space. The woman must squat, raise her clothes and seek shelter from a tree. She looks outward from the image; seems absorbed in it his gesture. The difference in posture materializes bodily and social constraints without it being necessary to invent a feminist program for Rembrandt.
The Rembrandt House Museum recalls that urination in public was not exceptional in the 17th century, but that it often appeared as a secondary detail, seen from the side or from behind. By giving these figures a print autonomous, Rembrandt makes frontal what the gender image usually relegated to the margins.
Technique
How does etching make a scene so small?
The plate is covered with acid-resistant varnish. Rembrandt draws in this varnish with a tip, exposes the copper, then lets the acid dig into the lines. The ink retained in these sizes passes onto the paper under pressure from the press.
| Area | Visible treatment | Reading effect |
|---|---|---|
| Face and headdress | Tight holes, crossed in places. | The gaze becomes the densest and most psychologically active point. |
| Clothing | Fast curves and networks of lines that change direction. | The folds give body weight without continuous modeling. |
| Tree | Irregular contours, vertical sizes, abbreviated vegetation. | It serves as a decor, screen and structural support. |
| Sol | Nervous features and shadows under the face. | The woman appears physically posed, unsuspended in white. |
| Sky or background | Very little work. | The paper reserve visually enlarges the space and directs the gaze off-camera. |
Smallness therefore does not mean poverty. On a real scale, every millimeter counts. An extra line can harden an outline, bring a shadow closer together, or change the expression. This is why observing a photograph enlarged should always be supplemented by knowledge of the original dimensions.
Around 1631
The street, the nude, and ordinary attention
The British Museum connects the small figures from 1630 -1631 to the prints of Jacques Callot and considers the idea of an informal set. We must remain cautious: we do not have a series title designed by Rembrandt. Proximity of format, date and subject allows a comparison, not the certain reconstruction of a lost editorial project.
Reception
Why did the work bother amateurs?
In the 17th century, bodily functions already belonged to comic visual culture and tavern or country scenes. The Rijksmuseum explains that these images, considered vulgar or inappropriate today, were then one popular source of amusement. This does not mean that everyone in the audience looked at them in the same way, nor that the act was devoid of embarrassment: the woman's turned head makes the possibility of being surprised the spring of the scene.
In the 19th century, the construction of a "grand master" Rembrandt made this rawness more difficult to accept. The British Museum's commentary recalls that some connoisseurs struggled to believe that he was the author. In 1890, the cataloger Dmitri Rovinski even called the image an "artistic horror". This reaction tells us as much about the morality of the modern collector as about the print itself.
The current reception is moving. The subject can make people laugh, provoke or embarrass, but above all it reveals the coherence of the rembranesque gaze: an ordinary event deserves the same precision of posture as a saint, a model or the artist himself.
Facts and interpretations
What the sources allow us to affirm
Established facts
- The etching bears the monogram and the date "RHL 1631".
- Institutional tests measure approximately 79-81 × 63-65 mm.
- The New Hollstein distinguishes two states; the British Museum preserves a proof of the second.
- The female figure and the male counterpart have a similar subject and dimensions.
- Later copies exist, notably by Vivant Denon and by anonymous engravers.
Cautious interpretations
- The woman appears to be watching for a witness to arrive, but her identity and thoughts are unknown.
- The couple of prints were probably designed as a counterpart; no written program by Rembrandt confirms this.
- The image can be comical, documentary, provocative or several things at once.
- It proves neither systematic social compassion nor contempt for the model.
- The title does not definitively decide between urination and defecation.
Reading method
Six minutes in front of a tiny print
Find the ladder
Mentally draw a rectangle of 8 × 6.5 cm. Digital enlargement should not make us forget the physical proximity of the object.
See the silhouette
First ignore the details: the vertical tree, the body triangle and the void on the right organize the whole scene.
Follow the gaze
Head turned opens the image. Ask where the viewer is in relation to the figure.
Compare densities
Oppose the hatching of the face and clothing to the almost intact paper at the bottom.
Distinguish condition and test
A plate rework is not the same as a variation in inking or paper between two prints.
Read the entire instructions
Title, catalog number, watermark and copy assignment avoid commercial confusion.
Where to see the work?
Several tests, rarely exhibited permanently
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam
The museum notably retains a first and second state, which can be consulted in high definition in its online collection.
British Museum, London
The proof 1848,0911.97 is a second state, printed on watermarked paper dating from around 1634 -1636. It is not currently on display.
Petit Palais, Paris
The Dutuit collection preserves an original proof from 1631, inventory GDUT7872, presented online under CC0 license.
Paper and inks are sensitive to light: the words "unexposed" are normal for a print. Before a visit, check the instructions and rotations of the graphic arts office.
Collection
Explore the Rembrandt universe
No products matching exactly The Pisser currently not available in store. So as not to associate the work with one reproduction approximate or a poorly attributed copy, the commercial link only refers to the artist's general collection.
Read next
Deepen Rembrandt engraver
FAQs
Frequently asked questions about The Pisser
What is the exact title of the work?
Titles vary by language and catalog: The Woman Who Pisses, The Pisser, A Woman Making Water or Woman relieving herself under a tree. These are later descriptive titles, not a literary title given by Rembrandt.
Does the woman urinate or defecate?
The traditional title speaks of urination, but the British Museum describes defecation and the Rijksmuseum combines the two subjects. Posture and clothing prevent you from deciding with certainty. It is more rigorous to say that it relieves itself.
Is the print really by Rembrandt?
Yes, the 1631 original is cataloged as a Rembrandt etching and bears his monogram. There are, however, later copies that must be distinguished from the original, including a copy of Vivant Denon and anonymous copies.
How many states are there?
The New Hollstein distinguishes two states. Older catalogs have not always separated these phases in the same way, which explains references like Bartsch 191.I while meeting New Hollstein 79.II.
Why is the picture so small?
Rembrandt produced several tiny street figures around 1630 -1631. This format favors close observation, almost held in the hand, and allows very direct experimental execution.
The pissing man is it its counterpart?
Most likely according to the British Museum: the subjects respond to each other, the heights are almost identical and the two plaques bear the date 1631. However, we do not have a written statement from Rembrandt.
Why did some ancient critics reject the work?
The rawness of the subject seemed incompatible with the idealized image of the "grand master". In the 19th century, some connoisseurs therefore doubted or expressed strong disgust, revealing the evolution of standards of convenience.
Can we see the original at the museum?
Original prints can be seen in several collections, but they are not necessarily exhibited. Prints on paper are presented in rotations. Consult the notices of the Rijksmuseum, the British Museum or the Petit Palais before the visit.
Main sources
Institutional notices consulted
- Rijksmuseum - A Woman Making Water, RP-P-1961-1101 : second state, dimensions, technique, monogram, Bartsch and New Hollstein references.
- Rijksmuseum - A woman making water, RP-P-OB-637 : first condition and plate tint.
- British Museum - A woman making water, 1848,0911.97 : second state, watermark, description and exhibition history.
- British Museum - A man making water, 1848,0911.96 : hypothesis of pendants, group of small figures and reception in the 19th century.
- Petit Palais /Paris Museums - The Woman Who Pisses, GDUT7872 : original proof, dimensions, inscription and provenance Dutuit.
- Rembrandt House - Rembrandt Observes People : visual conventions of bodily functions and observation of ordinary figures.
- Rijksmuseum - Diana at the Bath and The Pancake Woman : comparisons of subjects and technique.
Consultation: August 2026. The images of the body of the article come from the public domain files of the Rijksmuseum, have been verified, optimized in WebP and imported to the Shopify CDN. Copy assignments are taken exactly according to the institutions.
0 comments