Klimt · Faculties Paintings · 1903 -1907
Jurisprudence condemnation, octopus and hostile powers
Jurisprudence was to glorify law for the University of Vienna. Klimt does the opposite: he paints a naked old man, already condemned, caught in the tentacles of an octopus, under the distant gaze of Justice, Law and Truth. An official allegory turns into a modern nightmare.
The short answer
An allegory of law that has become an image of condemnation
Jurisprudence is one of three large paintings of the Faculties made by Gustav Klimt for the ceiling of the great hall of the University of Vienna. With Philosophy and Medicine, it was to represent academic knowledge in a monumental way.
Instead of celebrating law as order, light and progress, Klimt shows a naked, elderly, curled up accused, already trapped. In front of him emerges a huge octopus. Behind him stand three disturbing women, close to the ancient Erinyes. At the top, Justice, Law and Truth appear very far away, almost inaccessible.
This distance is the deep meaning of the painting: the law does not appear as immediate protection, but as a cold, vertical system, separated from the suffering body. The work has been lost since 1945, but his archive photographs remain among the most powerful images of the Dark Klimt.
I · Analysis
Court doesn't raise: it crushes
Klimt constructs the image into two separate worlds. Below: the guilty body, animalized by the octopus. Above: the abstract principles of law, erected like cold icons.
A naked and old body
The condemned person has no costume, no social status, no visible defense. His nudity makes him vulnerable: the law acts here on an exposed body.
A sprawling inevitability
His arms hold man like chains. Belvedere reads the power of destiny, stronger than simple procedure.
Three vengeful women
They recall the ancient goddesses of vengeance: fault is not only judged, it is pursued.
A truth too far away
Justice, Law and Truth exist, but they are placed very high, separated from the accused by the full height of the painting.
II · Conviction
Octopus isn't a weird detail: it's the heart of the picture
In Klimt, the octopus functions on several levels: marine animal, ancient monster, power of destiny, judicial machine, sexual envelope and symbol of control.
The condemned captured
The man is bent, dominated by the dark mass of the octopus. He is not being judged: he already seems to have been sentenced.
The nightmare falls into place
The sketch shows how Klimt seeks the balance between official verticality and organic violence. The academic program becomes a scene of anxiety.
| Pattern | Immediate reading | Klimtian reading |
|---|---|---|
| Octopus | Monster gripping accused. | Destiny, influence, procedure, opaque force that no one masters. |
| Male nude | A culprit in court. | A being stripped of all social dignity, reduced to the body. |
| Erinyes | Vengeful women. | Law becomes mythological, instinctual, almost archaic. |
| Justice, Law, Truth | The noble principles of jurisprudence. | Ideals too far from humans to save them. |
III · Scandal
Why the University of Vienna could not accept this painting
The commission required a reassuring image of knowledge. Klimt responds with pessimism, nudity, aging, guilt and implicit criticism of institutions.
IV · The Faculties
Philosophy, Medicine, Jurisprudence: three dark responses to progress
Klimt's three paintings were to represent the domains of knowledge. Rather, they show a humanity exposed to the unknown, illness, death and condemnation.
Philosophy
A river of human beings, a dark sphinx, an elusive truth: Klimt refuses the luminous image of thought.
Medicine
Medical knowledge does not appear as a triumph over death, but as a presence in the midst of a flow of vulnerable bodies.
Jurisprudence
The law becomes the harshest of the three visions: judgment falls on man more than it protects him.
The common thread
The scandal doesn't just come from nudity. It comes from the fact that Klimt takes away from science its official image of progress: he shows it in the face of forces beyond it.
V · Archive images and reconstruction
Look at a work that no longer exists
As the original is missing, you have to look Jurisprudence through several layers: old photograph, final state, sketch, room documents and hypothetical recoloring.
Photography as survival
Without these images, the painting would be almost invisible. They preserve the composition, but not all the material or color.
A recoloring to read carefully
Recent recoloring projects give a possible idea of the palette, but they never replace the lost original.
Hygieia
Hygieia's detail, related to Medicine, helps to understand what color could change in the paintings of the Faculties.
The room program
The project was to be part of a monumental university setting. The gap between the official expectation and Klimt's response explains the violence of the reception.
VI · Real places
Vienna around Jurisprudence
The painting is no longer visible, but its locations remain: the University which commissioned it, the Secession which exhibited Klimt, the Albertina for the drawings, the Belvedere for the archives and research.
University of Vienna
The project was intended for the University's main hall. It will ultimately never be installed there.
Vienna in 1900
The scandal arises in a city that wants to be modern, but whose institutions remain attached to honorary allegories.
The Secession
The Secession provides Klimt with a space where aesthetic rupture can be shown to the public.
The Albertina
Klimt's studies shed light on the transformation of figure, drawing and line around Jurisprudence.
The Belvedere
The museum preserves and distributes an essential part of the documentation on the paintings of the Faculties.
Shop
Extend Jurisprudence: Klimt, Secession, symbols and powers
The work is lost, but its universe dialogues with the great decorative, biblical, aquatic and secessionist Klimts.
Sources
Sources used
Museum and documentary sources to verify the commission, iconography, studies, the Faculty scandal and the destruction of works.
Faculty Paintings
Order, scandal, iconography of Jurisprudence, octopus, Erinyes and destruction in 1945.
Klimt DatabaseThe Klimt Affair
Detailed chronology of Faculties' paintings, critical reception and break with public procurement.
AlbertinaStudies for Jurisprudence
Role of drawings, linearity, vengeful figures and influence of the Beethoven Frieze.
University of ViennaHistorical notice
University commission, public criticism, takeover by Klimt and destruction in 1945.
Vienna Tourist BoardKlimt reconstructed
Lost paintings, black and white photographs, digital reconstruction and history of Immendorf.
Wikimedia CommonsImages of the Faculties
Public images used as the basis for files uploaded to Shopify CDN.
Frequently asked questions
Understanding Klimt’s Jurisprudence
When did Klimt paint Jurisprudence?
The work was prepared from 1898, presented in 1903, then slightly revised until 1907 according to museum sources.
Where is Jurisprudence today?
The original no longer exists. It was destroyed in 1945 along with the other paintings of the Faculties, probably in the fire of Immendorf Castle.
What does the octopus represent?
The octopus surrounds the condemned as a chain. The Belvedere interprets it as a symbol of the power of destiny.
Who are the three women behind the accused?
They are generally identified with the Erinyes, ancient figures of vengeance who pursue faults and crimes.
Why did Jurisprudence scandalize?
Because she refused to idealize law. Instead of a noble and reassuring allegory, Klimt paints guilt, control, the naked body and the distance of abstract principles.
What is the link with La Frise Beethoven?
Albertina emphasizes that the work on the Beethoven Frieze marked the linear and monumental evolution of Klimt at the time of Jurisprudence.
Are color images reliable?
Recent recolorizations are scholarly hypotheses based on data, descriptions and comparisons. They do not replace the lost original.
Which collection to explore after this article?
Start with Gustav Klimt, then Viennese secession, Symbolism and Beethoven frieze.
0 comments