Detail of Francis I supporting the dying Leonardo da Vinci in Ingres' painting
Ingres · 1818 · Petit Palais

The Death of Leonardo da Vinci by Ingres

A king leaning over a dying genius, a room as red as a theater stage and a crucial detail: Francis I was not there. Ingres does not paint a report, but the perfect form of a political and artistic myth.

Official titleFrancis I receives the last sighs of Leonardo da Vinci
Date1818, painted in Rome
TechniqueOil on canvas, 40 × 50.5 cm
LocationPetit Palais, Paris
2

may 1519: what the painting transforms

Short answer: Ingres represents Leonardo da Vinci expiring in the arms of Francis I at Clos Lucé. This scene, popularized by Giorgio Vasari then by history painting, is fictional. The documents place the king in Saint-Germain-en-Laye, where the court celebrates the birth of his second son.

The link between the two men is real: Leonardo lived in France from 1516 to 1519, protected by François I. The painting therefore condenses a historical relationship in an instant which never took place. It is precisely this condensation - the patron symbolically receiving the heritage of genius - which gives it its power.

To remember: the lie is about the king's presence, not his role as protector. Ingres makes real patronage an imaginary ceremony of transmission.
See the entire work

A room transformed into a theater of History

Ingres focuses attention on the group in bed, but lets a second story breathe on the right: courtiers, seated dignitary and child in costume extend the emotion with the picturesque.

Full view of Ingres' painting depicting the death of Leonardo da Vinci
Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, Francis I receives the last sighs of Leonardo da Vinci, 1818, oil on canvas, 40 × 50.5 cm, Petit Palais. Image CC0 Paris Museums.
Painting by Ingres presented in its golden frame at the Petit Palais
01

A cabinet object

The relatively small format brings the viewer closer to the action. In its golden setting, the scene resembles a precious window into history, intended for the close gaze of a collector.

Detail of the courtiers and the child in Ingres' painting
02

The picturesque counterpoint

On the right, looks and gestures relay the news. The young golden figure almost distracts attention from the drama: Ingres mixes the seductive details of the "old days" with the sublime of death.

Composition analysis

Six choices that make the scene immediately readable

Red

The canopy frames the bed, heats the entire room and transforms the alcove into a stage. Color is not a background: it directs the eye.

White

Leonardo's sheets, shirt and face make up a light area where the body already seems to leave the material.

The diagonal

The movement descends from the king's face towards Leonardo's inert arm. This relaxed arm is the most direct sign of death.

Profiles

Ingres contrasts the energetic face of Francis I with the painter's upside-down head. Living power meets genius which is extinguished.

Thresholds

Curtains, armchair backs and characters divide the space into compartments, like successive slides.

The small format

At 40 × 50.5 cm, the work is closely visible. It is less of a large public setting than a precious historical miniature.

Portrait of Francis I in profile by Titian
Titian, Francis I, 1538, Louvre Museum. Public domain.
A memory made of images

Ingres borrows his Francis I from Titian

The Petit Palais specifies that Ingres transposes the famous profile portrait painted by Titian in 1538. The sovereign is therefore not reconstructed according to a witness from 1519: he is recognized thanks to a canonical effigy, painted almost twenty years later the death of Leonardo.

This process is essential. Ingres composes History as a montage of visual memories. He chooses the forms that the public already associates with the French Renaissance: black hat, velvet, red, sculpted furniture and refined costumes. Documentary accuracy gives way to cultural plausibility.

Preparatory drawing of Ingres for the death of Leonardo
Ingres, preparatory drawing, Louvre museum. The sheet is assembled with several fragments.
In the workshop

The drawing reveals a composition constructed by repeats

The preparatory sheet kept at the Louvre is not a spontaneous sketch. It is made of joined fragments: Ingres cuts, moves and glues certain elements together to adjust the curtain, the seat and the gestures. The painting is therefore born from a real montage.

This method explains the almost artificial precision of the scene. Each silhouette fulfills a function: to support, to look, to bow, to bear witness. Even the hand extended to the right acts like an arrow leading back to the bed.

From story to image

How a phrase from Vasari becomes visual truth

The legend settles in stages. Each time, the king moves a little closer to the bed until he becomes the last witness of the genius.

1519

Leonardo died on May 2 at Clos Lucé. François I was then in Île-de-France.

1550

Vasari publishes them Lives and magnifies Leonardo's last moments with the king.

1781

Ménageot monumentalizes the stage for Louis XVI and the Salon. The image is widely disseminated through engraving.

1818

Ingres narrows the episode into a cabinet painting, intimate, precious and charged with emotion.

What is documented

  • Leonardo arrived in France around 1516 and lived at Clos Lucé.
  • Francis I protects him and grants him a pension.
  • The painter died in Amboise on May 2, 1519.
  • The king helped to bring his work into French collections.

What the image invents

  • The presence of Francis I in the room.
  • The embrace at the moment of the last breath.
  • The courtyard assembled around the bed.
  • An almost physical transmission from Italian genius to the French monarchy.
Compare versions

Ménageot dramatizes death; Ingres intimidates him

The subject existed before Ingres. The comparison shows how the same legend can serve two image regimes and two political moments.

Version of Leonardo's death by Ménageot around 1781

Ménageot, circa 1781

In this version kept at LACMA, the room opens to a more monumental group. The prototype exhibited at the Salon pour la Monarchie of Louis XVI helps to establish the myth in visual culture.

Public domain, Los Angeles County Museum of Art.
1818

Ingres tightens the myth

The great historical machine becomes a cabinet scene. The faces come closer, the bed advances towards the spectator and the gesture of François I replaces the collective pageantry.

Desired effect: less ceremony, more confidence - but always the same political idea of a king receiving the inheritance of genius.

Photograph by Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres around 1855
Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres photographed by Disdéri around 1855. BnF, public domain.
Rome, 1818

Why did Ingres paint this subject during the Restoration?

After his pension at the French Academy, Ingres remained in Italy and lived in particular on portraits and small historical paintings intended for collectors. The sponsor of this work, the Count of Blacas, was ambassador of Louis XVIII to Rome and an influential figure in the restored regime.

The choice of a French king protector of the greatest Italian artist is therefore anything but neutral. It celebrates a cultivated monarchy, capable of attracting foreign genius and collecting its heritage. Francis I becomes the ideal model of the sovereign patron; Leonardo, that of the artist recognized on the verge of death.

The troubadour style responds perfectly to this ambition: it tells the big story through an intimate anecdote, rich in costumes, furniture and emotion.

Current reconstruction of Leonardo da Vinci's room at Clos Lucé
Current reconstruction of Léonard's room at Clos Lucé. Photo Léonard de Serres, CC BY-SA 3.0.
The actual location

Clos Lucé is not Ingres' setting

The room visible today at Clos Lucé is a heritage reconstruction. It helps to imagine a Renaissance interior, but should not be confused with an intact conservation of the room in 1519.

Ingres does not seek to reproduce the Amboise manor. Its red alcove synthesizes the historicizing taste of the 19th century. This discrepancy is fruitful: it reminds us that the painting tells us more about the desire for the past of 1818 than about Leonardo's real room.

For the factual history of the last few days, also see our article When and from what did Leonardo da Vinci die?

Reverse of Ingres' painting at the Petit Palais
The other side of the painting: chassis, labels and traces of its material life. CC0 Paris Museums.
The object behind the image

The reverse reminds us that a myth is also a transported canvas

Seeing the back of the work breaks the theatrical illusion. The frame, frame, old labels and exhibition marks tell another story: that of a painting passed from private commission to public collections.

Painted in Rome, acquired by the Petit Palais in 1968 thanks to the arrears of the Dutuit legacy, it is today inventoried under the number PDUT1165. This documented materiality contrasts with the fictional episode depicted on the front - and makes the work even more interesting.

View original

The painting is exhibited at the Petit Palais in Paris

Facade of the Petit Palais in Paris
Facade of the Petit Palais. Photo KoS, CC BY-SA 3.0.

Essential information

Museum: Petit Palais, Museum of Fine Arts of the City of Paris
Inventory: PDUT1165
Hanging indicated: ground floor, room 29

The hanging may change. Check the work sheet before your visit to the official website of the Petit Palais.

The museum also has Henry IV playing with his children, historical counterpart which illuminates Ingres' taste for royal anecdote.

Tomb of Leonardo da Vinci in Amboise
Tomb of Leonardo in the Saint-Hubert chapel, Château d'Amboise. Photo Gzen92, Creative Commons license.
After the picture

The memory of Leonardo in Amboise

Leonardo had asked to be buried in the Saint-Florentin collegiate church of the Château d'Amboise. After the disappearance of the building and research in the 19th century, remains attributed to the painter were transferred in 1874 to the Saint-Hubert chapel.

This material history of the tomb is less simple than Ingres' account, but it shows the same desire: to give a visible place and form to the memory of the genius. To extend the visit, read Where is Leonardo da Vinci buried?

Hand painted reproduction of The Death of Leonardo da Vinci by Ingres
In the store

Find this scene in hand-painted reproduction

Ingres' composition is available in the store. Its horizontal format, the depth of the red and the central group require careful reproduction of contrasts and faces, not a simple impression.

Frequently asked questions

Understanding The Death of Leonardo da Vinci by Ingres

Was Francis I present when Leonardo da Vinci died?

No. Leonardo died at Clos Lucé on May 2, 1519, while François I was in Saint-Germain-en-Laye. The presence of the king at the bedside is a legend from Vasari.

What is the exact title of the table?

The Petit Palais calls it Francis I receives the last sighs of Leonardo da Vinci. It is also found under the short title The Death of Leonardo da Vinci.

When did Ingres paint the work?

Ingres painted it in Rome in 1818. It is signed and dated "Ingres Pint. 1818" at the bottom left.

Who ordered the painting?

It is painted for the Count of Blacas, ambassador of Louis XVIII to Rome and important personality of the Restoration.

Where can we see the painting today?

It belongs to the Petit Palais, Museum of Fine Arts of the City of Paris. The official sheet indicates it exhibited on the ground floor, room 29, subject to change of hanging.

Why do we talk about troubadour style?

Because the painting tells national history through an intimate anecdote, with ancient costumes, picturesque decor and sentimental emotion. This taste developed strongly at the beginning of the 19th century.

0 comments

Leave a comment

Please note that comments must be approved before they are published.