Washington Crossing the Delaware, painting by Emanuel Leutze at the Metropolitan Museum of Art
#1 - Washington Crossing the Delaware

Top 100 - Metropolitan Museum of Art

Top 100 paintings from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

One hundred paintings to cross the Met without running, from Duccio to Van Gogh, from Vermeer to Sargent and from Bruegel to Ogata Kôrin.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art has enough major paintings to turn a one-hour tour into a negotiation with closing time. The hundred works come from the official Met records, with a distinct identity and image for each rank.

100classified works
77artists represented
around 1250-1940seven centuries of painting in a hundred stops
100 paintings100 official museum notices
Met iconsLeutze, David, Sargent, Van Gogh, Vermeer and Rembrandt open the tour with the images that have shaped the museum's reputation.
Renaissance and ancient mastersDuccio, Botticelli, Titian, Bruegel, El Greco and Caravaggio circulate the gaze from Italy to the Netherlands and Spain.
France, light and modernityIngres, Delacroix, Courbet, Manet, Degas, Renoir, Seurat and Cézanne move the story towards Paris and its visual revolutions.
Painting AmericaCole, Church, Bingham, Bierstadt, Homer, Eakins, Heade and Sargent give the museum its landscapes, portraits and national mythologies.
Beyond the European routePersian, Indian, Chinese and Japanese paintings remind us that an encyclopedic museum does not fit into a single wing, even a very well polished one.

One hundred paintings, a museum impossible to finish

The Metropolitan Museum without wearing out all its soles

The first places combine world notoriety, historical importance and emblematic role in the collection. Washington Crossing the Delaware, Madame.

The Met contains enough paintings to turn a quick visit into a full day. This Top 100 keeps masterpieces and leaves unnecessary detours in the locker room.
Switch to images

The 100 paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of Art

I
Iconic images

The first twenty rows bring together paintings whose fame extends beyond the Met galleries, from Washington Crossing the Delaware to the Van Goghs and the Vermeers.

Washington Crossing the Delaware, painting by Emanuel Leutze at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #1
Emanuel Leutze

Washington Crossing the Delaware

Date1851CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat149 x 255 in. (378.5 x 647.7 cm)

In "Washington Crossing the Delaware", the first look captures the subject; the second begins to understand how Emanuel Leutze organizes the meeting. Leutze transforms American history into a monumental theater, with enough wind in the flags to make us forget that Delaware was probably less cooperative. In "Washington Crossing the Delaware", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Washington Crossing the Delaware", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 1 of "Washington Crossing the Delaware" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
The Death of Socrates, painting by Jacques Louis David at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #2
Jacques Louis David

The Death of Socrates

Date1787CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat51 x 77 1/4 in. (129.5 x 196.2 cm)

David orders gestures, profiles and architecture with a neoclassical clarity that gives each moral decision the clarity of a verdict. In "The Death of Socrates", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 2 of "The Death of Socrates" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
Madame X (Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau), painting by John Singer Sargent at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #3
John Singer Sargent

Madame X (Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau)

Date1883 -84CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat82 1/8 × 43 1/4 in. (208.6 × 109.9 cm) Framed: 95 3/4 × 56 5/8 × 5 in. (243.2 × 143.8 × 12.7 cm)

With "Madame X (Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau)", John Singer Sargent transforms an identifiable motif into a construction of light, rhythm and presence. Sargent balances the portrait between virtuosity, social presence and details capable of discreetly stealing the scene from the model. In "Madame X (Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. Rank 3 of "Madame X (Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau)" combines international notoriety, historical importance and emblematic role in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum.

See the museum notice →
Wheat Field with Cypresses, painting by Vincent van Gogh at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #4
Vincent van Gogh

Wheat Field with Cypresses

Date1889CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat28 13/16 × 36 3/4 in. (73.2 × 93.4 cm)

The visual success of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is due to an immediately readable composition which nevertheless continues to provide details after the regulatory stop in front of the cartel. Van Gogh constructs the space by the direction of the key and by a color which describes both the emotion and the motif observed. The landscape of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on simple decor. The landscape of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on simple decor. The landscape of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on simple decor. The landscape of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on simple decor. The landscape of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on simple decor. Row 4 of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on simple decor. The landscape of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on simple decor. The landscape of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on simple decor. The row 4 of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on simple decor. The landscape of "Wheat Field with Cypresses" is based on depth

See the museum notice →
Iries, painting by Vincent van Gogh at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #5
Vincent van Gogh

Irises

Date1890CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat29 x 36 1/4 in. (73.7 x 92.1 cm)

"Irises" shows why Vincent van Gogh remains essential to the Met's journey: the work tells, describes and organizes space without confusing abundance and disorder. Van Gogh constructs the space by the direction of the key and by a color that describes both the emotion and the observed motif. In "Irises", objects, flowers or fruits allow color, texture and duration to be measured with a precision that makes the table surprisingly ambitious. Rank 5 of "Irises" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
Self-Portrait with a Straw Hat (obverse: The Potato Peeler), painting by Vincent van Gogh at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #6
Vincent van Gogh

Self-Portrait with a Straw Hat (obverse: The Potato Peeler)

Date1887CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat16 x 12 1/2 in. (40.6 x 31.8 cm)

In front of "Self-Portrait with a Straw Hat (obverse: The Potato Peeler)", the gaze moves from subject to material then returns to the subject with some additional information and, ideally, a little more drums. Van Gogh constructs the space through the direction of the key and through a color that describes both the emotion and the observed motif. In "Self-Portrait with a Straw Hat (obverse: The Potato Peeler)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. In "Self-Portrait with a Straw Hat (obverse: The Potato Peeler)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. Rank 6 of "Self-Portrait with a Straw Hat (obverse: The Potato Peeler)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. Rank 6 of "Self-Portrait with a Straw Hat (obverse: The Potato Peeler)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. Rank 6 of "Self-Portrait with a Straw Hat (obverse: The Potato Peeler)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face.

See the museum notice →
Aristotle with a Bust of Homer, painting by Rembrandt (Rembrandt van Rijn) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #7
Rembrandt (Rembrandt van Rijn)

Aristotle with a Bust of Homer

Date1653CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat56 1/2 x 53 3/4 in. (143.5 x 136.5 cm)

The place of "Aristotle with a Bust of Homer" in the collection does not depend only on its author: Rembrandt (Rembrandt van Rijn) condenses an era, a technique and a singular way of addressing the viewer. Rembrandt (Rembrandt van Rijn) gives "Aristotle with a Bust of Homer" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Aristotle with a Bust of Homer", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Aristotle with a Bust of Homer", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Aristotle with a Bust of Homer", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 7 of "Aristotle with a Bust of Homer" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an emblematic role in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum.

See the museum notice →
Juan de Pareja (ca. 1608 -1670), painting by Velázquez (Diego Rodriguez de Silva y Velázquez) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #8
Velazquez (Diego Rodriguez de Silva y Velazquez)

Juan de Pareja (ca. 1608 -1670)

Date1650CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat32 x 27 1/2 in. (81.3 x 69.9 cm)

"Juan de Pareja (ca. 1608 -1670)" has this rare quality of museum paintings: being recognizable in reproduction and much more complex as soon as you look at the edges, gestures and silences. Velazquez (Diego Rodriguez de Silva y Velazquez) gives "Juan de Pareja (ca. 1608 -1670)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Juan de Pareja (ca. 1608 -1670)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Juan de Pareja (ca. 1608 -1670)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Juan de Pareja (ca. 1608 -1670)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 8 of "Juan de Pareja (ca. 1608 -1670)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Juan de Pareja (ca. 1608 -1670)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 8 of "Juan de Pareja (ca. 1608

See the museum notice →
Young Woman with a Water Pitcher, painting by Johannes Vermeer at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #9
Johannes Vermeer

Young Woman with a Water Pitcher

Dateca. 1662CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat18 x 16 in. (45.7 x 40.6 cm)

In "Young Woman with a Water Pitcher", Johannes Vermeer adjusts the distance precisely; the work first attracts, then forces you to slow down. Vermeer transforms a calm room into an experience of light, geometry and waiting, without moving more furniture than necessary. In "Young Woman with a Water Pitcher", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. Rank 9 of "Young Woman with a Water Pitcher" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
The Harvesters, painting by Pieter Bruegel the Elder at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #10
Pieter Bruegel the Elder

The Harvesters

Date1565CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatOverall, including added strips at top, bottom, and right, 46 7/8 x 63 3/4 in. (119 x 162 cm); original painted surface 45 7/8 x 62 7/8 in. (119 x 162 cm); original painted surface 45 7/8 x 62 7/8 in. (116.5 x 159.5 cm)

The title "The Harvesters" announces the motif, but Pieter Bruegel the Elder adds a visual structure which explains its lasting presence in the galleries of the Met. Bruegel divides the action throughout the landscape and rewards the attentive eye with episodes that the first glance had let slip away. In "The Harvesters", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 10 of "The Harvesters" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an emblematic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
View of Toledo, painting by El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #11
El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos)

View of Toledo

Dateca. 1599 -1600CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat47 3/4 x 42 3/4 in. (121.3 x 108.6 cm)

In "View of Toledo", the first look captures the subject; the second begins to understand how El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos) organizes the meeting. El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos) gives "View of Toledo" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "View of Toledo" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than simple

See the museum notice →
The Musicians, painting by Caravaggio (Michelangelo Merisi) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #12
Caravaggio (Michelangelo Merisi)

The Musicians

Date1597CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat36 1/4 x 46 5/8 in. (92.1 x 118.4 cm)

Caravaggio (Michelangelo Merisi) gives "The Musicians" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The framing of "The Musicians" distributes movements, pauses and side glances like a scene in which no character has the entire storyline. Rank 12 of "The Musicians" combines international notoriety, historical significance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
The Dance Class, painting by Edgar Degas at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #13
Edgar Degas

The Dance Class

Date1874CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat32 7/8 x 30 3/8 in. (83.5 x 77.2 cm)

With "The Dance Class", Edgar Degas transforms an identifiable motif into a construction of light, rhythm and presence. Degas constructs his scenes as surprised framings, where work, waiting and ordinary gestures count more than official pose. The framing of "The Dance Class" distributes movements, pauses and side glances like a scene in which no character has the entire storyline. Rank 13 of "The Dance Class" distributes secondary movements, pauses and glances like a scene in which no character has the entire storyline. Rank 13 of "The Dance Class" combines international notoriety, historical significance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
The Gulf Stream, painting by Winslow Homer at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #14
Winslow Homer

The Gulf Stream

Date1899; reworked by 1906CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat28 1/8 x 49 1/8 in. (71.4 x 124.8 cm) Framed: 42 5/16 x 62 11/16 x 5 7/8 in. (107.5 x 159.3 x 15 cm)

The visual success of "The Gulf Stream" is due to an immediately readable composition which nevertheless continues to provide details after the regulatory stop before the cartel. Homer reduces the story to a few essential forces - sea, sky, body, waiting - then lets nature regain the advantage. The landscape of "The Gulf Stream" relies on depth, weather and the flow of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "The Gulf Stream" relies on depth, weather and the flow of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "The Gulf Stream" relies on depth, weather and the flow of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "The Gulf Stream" relies on depth, weather and the flow of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "The Gulf Stream" relies on depth, weather and the flow of light rather than simple decor. The landscape of "The Gulf Stream" relies on depth, weather and the flow of light rather than simple decor. Rank 14 of "The Gulf Stream" combines international notoriety, historical significance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
Joan of Arc, painting by Jules Bastien-Lepage at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #15
Jules Bastien-Lepage

Joan of Arc

Date1879CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat100 x 110 in. (254 x 279.4 cm)

"Joan of Arc" shows why Jules Bastien-Lepage remains essential to the Met's journey: the work tells, describes and organizes space without confusing abundance and disorder. Jules Bastien-Lepage gives "Joan of Arc" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Joan of Arc", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Joan of Arc", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 15 of "Joan of Arc" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an emblematic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
The Horse Fair, painting by Rosa Bonheur at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #16
Rosa Happiness

The Horse Fair

Date1852 -55CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat96 1/4 x 199 1/2 in. (244.5 x 506.7 cm)

In front of "The Horse Fair", the gaze moves from subject to material then returns to subject with some additional information and, ideally, a little more drums. Rosa Bonheur gives "The Horse Fair" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "The Horse Fair", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 16 of "The Horse Fair" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm -The Oxbow, painting by Thomas Cole at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #17
Thomas Cole

View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm -The Oxbow

Date1836CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat51 1/2 x 76 in. (130.8 x 193 cm)

The place of "View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm -The Oxbow" in the collection does not depend only on its author: Thomas Cole condenses an era, a technique and a singular way of addressing the viewer. Cole transforms the American landscape into a moral, historical and climatic narrative, with clouds rarely engaged as mere extras. The landscape of "View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm -The Oxbow" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The landscape of "View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm -The Oxbow" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The landscape of "View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm -The Oxbow" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The landscape of "View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm -The Oxbow" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The landscape of "View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm -The Oxbow" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The landscape of "View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm -The Oxbow" is based on depth, historical and climatic, with clouds rarely engaged as mere extras. The landscape of "View from Mount Holyoke, Northampton, Massachusetts, after a Thunderstorm -The Oxbow" is based on depth, historical and climatic, with clouds combines international notoriety, historical importance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
Heart of the Andes, painting by Frederic Edwin Church at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #18
Frederic Edwin Church

Heart of the Andes

Date1859CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat66 1/8 x 120 3/16 in. (168 x 302.9cm)

"Heart of the Andes" has this rare quality of museum paintings: being recognizable in reproduction and much more complex as soon as you look at the edges, gestures and silences. Church combines precise observation and panoramic spectacle to give the landscape the scale of a public event. In "Heart of the Andes", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 18 of "Heart of the Andes" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
The Card Players, painting by Paul Cézanne at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #19
Paul Cezanne

The Card Players

Date1890 -92CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat25 3/4 x 32 1/4 in. (65.4 x 81.9 cm)

In "The Card Players", Paul Cézanne adjusts the distance precisely; the work first attracts, then forces you to slow down. Cézanne slows down the motif to examine volumes, colorful relationships and stability; even an apple seems to have thought long and hard about its place. In "The Card Players", the relationships between figures, space and light seem to have explained the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "The Card Players", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 19 of "The Card Players" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an emblematic role in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum.

See the museum notice →
Two Men Contemplating the Moon, painting by Caspar David Friedrich at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #20
Caspar david friedrich

Two Men Contemplating the Moon

Dateca. 1825 -30CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat13 3/4 x 17 1/4 in. (34.9 x 43.8 cm)

The title "Two Men Contemplating the Moon" announces the motif, but Caspar David Friedrich adds a visual structure which explains its lasting presence in the galleries of the Met. Caspar David Friedrich gives "Two Men Contemplating the Moon" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Two Men Contemplating the Moon", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Two Men Contemplating the Moon", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. Rank 20 of "Two Men Contemplating the Moon" combines international notoriety, historical importance and an iconic role in the Metropolitan Museum collection.

See the museum notice →
II
French and American modernities

From Rembrandt and Vermeer to American landscapes, then from Manet to Klimt, this section brings together portraits, the outdoors and modern ruptures.

Self-Portrait, painting by Rembrandt (Rembrandt van Rijn) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #21
Rembrandt (Rembrandt van Rijn)

Self-Portrait

Date1660CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat31 5/8 x 26 1/2 in. (80.3 x 67.3 cm)

In "Self-Portrait", the first look captures the subject; the second begins to understand how Rembrandt (Rembrandt van Rijn) organizes the meeting. Rembrandt (Rembrandt van Rijn) gives "Self-Portrait" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Self-Portrait", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Self-Portrait" - 1660; Oil on canvas; 31 5/8 x 26 1/2 in. (80.3 x 67.3 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Study of a Young Woman, painting by Johannes Vermeer at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #22
Johannes Vermeer

Study of a Young Woman

Dateca. 1665-67CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat17 1/2 x 15 3/4 in. (44.5 x 40 cm)

Vermeer transforms a quiet room into an experience of light, geometry and waiting, without moving more furniture than necessary. In "Study of a Young Woman", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official benchmarks of "Study of a Young Woman" - ca. 1665-67; Oil on canvas; 17 1/2 x 15 3/4 in. (44.5 x 40 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Champion Single Sculls (Max Schmitt in a Single Scull), painting by Thomas Eakins at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #23
Thomas Eakins

The Champion Single Sculls (Max Schmitt in a Single Scull)

Date1871CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat32 1/4 x 46 1/4 in. (81.9 x 117.5 cm)

With "The Champion Single Sculls (Max Schmitt in a Single Scull)", Thomas Eakins transforms an identifiable motif into a construction of light, rhythm and presence. Eakins looks at the body, the craft and the space with a frankness that gives the modern scene an almost documentary density. In "The Champion Single Sculls (Max Schmitt in a Single Scull)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "The Champion Single Sculls (Max Schmitt in a Single Scull)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "The Champion Single Sculls (Max Schmitt in a Single Scull)" - 1871; Oil on canvas; 32 1/4 x 46 1/4 in. (81.9 x 117.5 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Veteran in a New Field, painting by Winslow Homer at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #24
Winslow Homer

The Veteran in a New Field

Date1865CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat24 1/8 x 38 1/8in. (61.3 x 96.8cm) Framed: 37 3/8 × 51 1/4 × 5 1/4 in. (94.9 × 130.2 × 13.3 cm)

The visual success of "The Veteran in a New Field" is due to an immediately readable composition which nevertheless continues to provide details after the regulatory ruling before the cartel. Homer reduces the story to a few essential forces - sea, sky, body, waiting - then lets nature regain the advantage. The landscape of "The Veteran in a New Field" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "The Veteran in a New Field" - 1865; Oil on canvas; 24 1/8 x 38 1/8in. (61.3 x 96.8cm) Framed: 37 3/8 × 51 1/4 × 5 1/4 in. (94.9 × 130.2 × 13.3 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Fur Traders Descending the Missouri, painting by George Caleb Bingham at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #25
George Caleb Bingham

Fur Traders Descending the Missouri

Date1845CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat29 x 36 1/2 in. (73.7 x 92.7 cm)

"Fur Traders Descending the Missouri" shows why George Caleb Bingham remains essential to the Met's journey: the work tells, describes and organizes space without confusing abundance and disorder. George Caleb Bingham gives "Fur Traders Descending the Missouri" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Fur Traders Descending the Missouri", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Fur Traders Descending the Missouri", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Fur Traders Descending the Missouri" - 1845; Oil on canvas; 29 x 36 1/2 in. (73.7 x 92.7 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak, painting by Albert Bierstadt at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #26
Albert bierstadt

The Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak

Date1863CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat73 1/2 x 120 3/4 in. (186.7 x 306.7 cm)

In front of "The Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak", the gaze moves from subject to material then returns to the subject with some additional information and, ideally, a little more drums. Albert Bierstadt gives "The Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak" a precise identity through design, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. The landscape of "The Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The landscape of "The Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "The Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak" are based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "The Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak" are based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "The Rocky Mountains, Lander's Peak" - 1863; Oil on canvas; 73 1/2 x 120 3/4 in. (186.7 x 306.7 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Approaching Thunder Storm, painting by Martin Johnson Heade at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #27
Martin Johnson Heade

Thunder Storm Approaching

Date1859CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat28 x 44in. (71.1 x 111.8cm) Framed: 42 1/2 × 58 3/8 × 5 in. (108 × 148.3 × 5 in. (108 × 148.3 × 12.7 cm)

The place of "Approaching Thunder Storm" in the collection does not depend only on its author: Martin Johnson Heade condenses an era, a technique and a unique way of addressing the viewer. Martin Johnson Heade gives "Approaching Thunder Storm" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Approaching Thunder Storm", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Approaching Thunder Storm" - 1859; Oil on canvas; 28 x 44in. (71.1 x 111.8cm) Framed: 42 1/2 × 58 3/8 × 5 in. (108 × 148.3 × 12.7 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Still Life -Violin and Music, painting by William Michael Harnett at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #28
William michael harnett

Still Life -Violin and Music

Date1888CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat40 x 30 in. (101.6 x 76.2 cm)

"Still Life -Violin and Music" has this rare quality of museum paintings: being recognizable in reproduction and much more complex as soon as you look at the edges, gestures and silences. William Michael Harnett gives "Still Life -Violin and Music" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The framing of "Still Life -Violin and Music" distributes movements, pauses and secondary glances like a scene of which no character has the entire scenario. The framing of "Still Life -Violin and Music" distributes movements, pauses and secondary glances like a scene of which no character has the entire scenario. The framing of "Still Life -Violin and Music" distributes movements, pauses and secondary glances like a scene of which no character has the entire scenario. The official landmarks of "Still Life -Violin and Music" - 1888; Oil on canvas; 40 x 30 in. (101.6 x 76.2 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
George Washington, painting by Gilbert Stuart at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #29
Gilbert Stuart

George Washington

Datebegun 1795CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat30 1/4 x 25 1/4 in. (76.8 x 64.1 cm)

In "George Washington", Gilbert Stuart adjusts the distance precisely; the work first attracts, then forces you to slow down. Gilbert Stuart gives "George Washington" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "George Washington", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "George Washington" - begun 1795; Oil on canvas; 30 1/4 x 25 1/4 in. (76.8 x 64.1 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Still Life with Apples and a Pot of Primroses, painting by Paul Cézanne at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #30
Paul Cezanne

Still Life with Apples and a Pot of Primroses

Dateca. 1890CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat28 3/4 x 36 3/8 in. (73 x 92.4 cm)

The title "Still Life with Apples and a Pot of Primroses" announces the motif, but Paul Cézanne adds a visual structure which explains its lasting presence in the Met galleries. Cézanne slows down the pattern to examine volumes, colored ratios and stability; even an apple seems to have thought long and hard about its place. In "Still Life with Apples and a Pot of Primroses", objects, flowers or fruits allow color, texture and duration to be measured with a precision that makes the table surprisingly ambitious. The official benchmarks of "Still Life with Apples and a Pot of Primroses" - ca. 1890; Oil on canvas; 28 3/4 x 36 3/8 in. (73 x 92.4 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Boating, painting by Edouard Manet at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #31
Edouard Manet

Boating

Date1874CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat38 1/4 x 51 1/4 in. (97.2 x 130.2 cm)

In "Boating", the first look captures the subject; the second begins to understand how Edouard Manet organizes the meeting. Manet simplifies the masses, hardens certain contrasts and leaves it to the viewer to resolve a scene which politely refuses to explain everything. In "Boating", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Boating" - 1874; Oil on canvas; 38 1/4 x 51 1/4 in. (97.2 x 130.2 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Young Lady in 1866, painting by Edouard Manet at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #32
Edouard Manet

Young Lady in 1866

Date1866CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat72 7/8 x 50 5/8 in. (185.1 x 128.6 cm)

Manet simplifies the masses, hardens certain contrasts and leaves it to the viewer to resolve a scene which politely refuses to explain everything. In "Young Lady in 1866", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Young Lady in 1866" - 1866; Oil on canvas; 72 7/8 x 50 5/8 in. (185.1 x 128.6 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Spanish Singer, painting by Edouard Manet at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #33
Edouard Manet

The Spanish Singer

Date1860CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat58 x 45 in. (147.3 x 114.3 cm)

With "The Spanish Singer", Edouard Manet transforms an identifiable motif into a construction of light, rhythm and presence. Manet simplifies the masses, hardens certain contrasts and leaves it to the viewer to resolve a scene which politely refuses to explain everything. In "The Spanish Singer", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "The Spanish Singer" - 1860; Oil on canvas; 58 x 45 in. (147.3 x 114.3 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Madame Georges Charpentier (Marguerite-Louise Lemonnier, 1848 -1904) and Her Children, Georgette-Berthe (1872 -1945) and Paul-Emile-Charles (1875 -1895), painting by Auguste Renoir at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #34
Auguste Renoir

Madame Georges Charpentier (Marguerite-Louise Lemonnier, 1848 -1904) and Her Children, Georgette-Berthe (1872 -1945) and Paul-Emile-Charles (1875 -1895)

Date1878CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat60 1/2 x 74 7/8 in. (153.7 x 190.2 cm)

The visual success of "Madame Georges Charpentier (Marguerite-Louise Lemonnier, 1848 -1904) and Her Children, Georgette-Berthe (1872 -1945) and Paul-Emile-Charles (1875 -1895)" is due to an immediately readable composition which nevertheless continues to provide details after the regulatory ruling before the cartel. Auguste Renoir gives "Madame Georges Charpentier (Marguerite-Louise Lemonnier, 1848 -1904) and Her Children, Georgette-Berthe (1872 -1945) and Paul-Emile-Charles (1875 -1895)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Madame Georges Charpentier (Marguerite-Louise Lemonnier, 1848 -1904) and Her Children, Georgette-Berthe (1872 -1945) and Paul-Emile-Charles (1875 -1895)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Madame Georges Charpentier (Marguerite-Louise Lemonnier, 1848 -1904) and Her Children, Georgette-Berthe (1872 -1945) and Paul-Emile-Charles (1875 -1895)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Madame Georges Charpentier (Marguerite-Louise Lemonnier, 1848 -1904) and Her Children, Georgette- (1872 -1945) and Paul-Emile-Charles (1875 -1895)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official references of "Madame Georges Charpentier (Marguerite-Louise Lemonnier, 1848 -1904) and Her Children, Georgette-Berthe (1872 -1945) and Paul-Emile-Charles (1875 -1895)" - 1878; Oil on canvas; 60 1/2 x 74 7/8 in. (153.7 x 190.2 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
By the Seashore, painting by Auguste Renoir at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #35
Auguste Renoir

By the Seashore

Date1883CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat36 1/4 x 28 1/2 in. (92.1 x 72.4 cm)

"By the Seashore" shows why Auguste Renoir remains essential to the Met's journey: the work tells, describes and organizes space without confusing abundance and disorder. Auguste Renoir gives "By the Seashore" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The landscape of "By the Seashore" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The landscape of "By the Seashore" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "By the Seashore" - 1883; Oil on canvas; 36 1/4 x 28 1/2 in. (92.1 x 72.4 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Two Young Girls at the Piano, painting by Auguste Renoir at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #36
Auguste Renoir

Two Young Girls at the Piano

Date1892CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat44 × 34 in. (111.8 × 86.4 cm) Framed: 57 3/8 × 47 in. (145.7 × 119.4 cm)

In front of "Two Young Girls at the Piano", the gaze moves from subject to material then returns to the subject with some additional information and, ideally, a little more drums. Auguste Renoir gives "Two Young Girls at the Piano" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Two Young Girls at the Piano", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Two Young Girls at the Piano" - 1892; Oil on canvas; 44 × 34 in. (111.8 × 86.4 cm) Framed: 57 3/8 × 47 in. (145.7 × 119.4 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Circus Sideshow (Circus Parade), painting by Georges Seurat at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #37
Georges Seurat

Circus Sideshow (Circus Parade)

Date1887 -88CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat39 1/4 x 59 in. (99.7 x 149.9 cm)

The place of "Circus Sideshow (Circus Parade)" in the collection does not depend only on its author: Georges Seurat condenses an era, a technique and a singular way of addressing the spectator. Georges Seurat gives "Circus Sideshow (Circus Parade)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Circus Sideshow (Circus Parade)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Circus Sideshow (Circus Parade)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Circus Sideshow (Circus Parade)" - 1887-88; Oil on canvas; 39 1/4 x 59 in. (99.7 x 149.9 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Study for "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte", painting by Georges Seurat at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #38
Georges Seurat

Study for "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte"

Date1884CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat27 3/4 x 41 in. (70.5 x 104.1 cm)

"Study for "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte"" has this rare quality of museum paintings: being recognizable in reproduction and much more complex as soon as you look at the edges, gestures and silences. Georges Seurat gives "Study for "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Study for "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte"", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Study for "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte"", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Study for "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte"", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Study for "A Sunday on La Grande Jatte"" - 1884; Oil on canvas; 27 3/4 x 41 in. (70.5 x 104.1 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Ia Orana Maria (Hail Mary), painting by Paul Gauguin at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #39
Paul Gauguin

Ia Orana Maria (Hail Mary)

Date1891CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat44 3/4 x 34 1/2 in. (113.7 x 87.6 cm)

In "Ia Orana Maria (Hail Mary)", Paul Gauguin adjusts the distance precisely; the work first attracts, then forces you to slow down. Paul Gauguin gives "Ia Orana Maria (Hail Mary)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Ia Orana Maria (Hail Mary)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Ia Orana Maria (Hail Mary)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "Ia Orana Maria (Hail Mary)" - 1891; Oil on canvas; 44 3/4 x 34 1/2 in. (113.7 x 87.6 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Mäda Primavesi (1903 -2000), painting by Gustav Klimt at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #40
Gustav Klimt

Mäda Primavesi (1903 -2000)

Date1912 -13CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat59 x 43 1/2 in. (149.9 x 110.5 cm)

The title "Mäda Primavesi (1903 -2000)" announces the motif, but Gustav Klimt adds a visual structure which explains its lasting presence in the galleries of the Met. Gustav Klimt gives "Mäda Primavesi (1903 -2000)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Mäda Primavesi (1903 -2000)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Mäda Primavesi (1903 -2000)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "Mäda Primavesi (1903 -2000)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "Mäda Primavesi (1903 -2000)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "Mäda Primavesi (1903 -2000)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "Mäda Primavesi (1903 -2000)" - 1912 -13; Oil on canvas; 59 x 43 1/2 in. (149.9 x 110.5 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
III
Theater, portrait and history

Moreau, Delacroix, Turner, Ingres, Goya and Poussin give the painted story gestures, costumes and a few clouds which take their role very seriously.

Oedipus and the Sphinx, painting by Gustave Moreau at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #41
Gustave Moreau

Oedipus and the Sphinx

Date1864CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat81 1/4 × 41 1/4 in. (206.4 × 104.8 cm)

In "Oedipus and the Sphinx", the first look captures the subject; the second begins to understand how Gustave Moreau organizes the meeting. Gustave Moreau gives "Oedipus and the Sphinx" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Oedipus and the Sphinx", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Oedipus and the Sphinx" - 1864; Oil on canvas; 81 1/4 × 41 1/4 in. (206.4 × 104.8 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Repast of the Lion, painting by Henri Rousseau (the Customs Officer) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #42
Henri Rousseau (the Customs Officer)

The Repast of the Lion

Dateca. 1907CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat44 3/4 in. × 63 in. (113.7 × 160 cm)

Henri Rousseau (the Customs Officer) gives "The Repast of the Lion" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "The Repast of the Lion", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "The Repast of the Lion" - ca. 1907; Oil on canvas; 44 3/4 in. × 63 in. (113.7 × 160 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Englishman (William Tom Warrener, 1861 -1934) at the Moulin Rouge, painting by Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #43
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec

The Englishman (William Tom Warrener, 1861 -1934) at the Moulin Rouge

Date1892CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat33 3/4 x 26 in. (85.7 x 66 cm)

With "The Englishman (William Tom Warrener, 1861 -1934) at the Moulin Rouge", Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec transforms an identifiable motif into a construction of light, rhythm and presence. Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec gives "The Englishman (William Tom Warrener, 1861 -1934) at the Moulin Rouge" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "The Englishman (William Tom Warrener, 1861 -1934) at the Moulin Rouge", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "The Englishman (William Tom Warrener, 1861 -1934) at the Moulin Rouge", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "The Englishman (William Tom Warrener, 1861 -1934) at the Moulin Rouge", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "The Englishman (William Tom Warrener, 1861 -1934) at the Moulin Rouge", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "The Englishman (William Tom Warrener, 1861 -1934) at the Moulin Rouge", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "The Englishman (William Tom Warrener, 1861 -1934) at the Moulin Rouge", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "The Englishman (W

See the museum notice →
The Abduction of Rebecca, painting by Eugène Delacroix at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #44
Eugene Delacroix

The Abduction of Rebecca

Date1846CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat39 1/2 x 32 1/4 in. (100.3 x 81.9 cm)

The visual success of "The Abduction of Rebecca" is due to an immediately readable composition which nevertheless continues to provide details after the regulatory ruling before the cartel. Delacroix advances the story through color, diagonals and shocks of light rather than through a wisely aligned narration. In "The Abduction of Rebecca", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "The Abduction of Rebecca" - 1846; Oil on canvas; 39 1/2 x 32 1/4 in. (100.3 x 81.9 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Whalers, painting by Joseph Mallord William Turner at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #45
Joseph Mallord William Turner

Whalers

Dateca. 1845CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat36 1/8 x 48 1/4 in. (91.8 x 122.6 cm)

"Whalers" shows why Joseph Mallord William Turner remains essential to the Met's journey: the work tells, describes and organizes space without confusing abundance and disorder. Joseph Mallord William Turner gives "Whalers" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Whalers", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "Whalers" - ca. 1845; Oil on canvas; 36 1/8 x 48 1/4 in. (91.8 x 122.6 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Toilet of Venus, painting by François Boucher at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #46
François Boucher

The Toilet of Venus

Date1751CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat42 5/8 x 33 1/2 in. (108.3 x 85.1 cm)

In front of "The Toilette of Venus", the gaze moves from subject to material then returns to the subject with some additional information and, ideally, a little more drums. François Boucher gives "The Toilette of Venus" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "The Toilette of Venus", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "The Toilette of Venus" - 1751; Oil on canvas; 42 5/8 x 33 1/2 in. (108.3 x 85.1 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Soap Bubbles, painting by Jean Siméon Chardin at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #47
Jean Siméon Chardin

Soap Bubbles

Dateca. 1733 -34CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat24 x 24 7/8 in. (61 x 63.2 cm)

The place of "Soap Bubbles" in the collection does not depend only on its author: Jean Siméon Chardin condenses an era, a technique and a unique way of addressing the viewer. Jean Siméon Chardin gives "Soap Bubbles" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Soap Bubbles", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Soap Bubbles" - ca. 1733-34; Oil on canvas; 24 x 24 7/8 in. (61 x 63.2 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Mezzetin, painting by Antoine Watteau at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #48
Antoine Watteau

Mezzetin

Dateca. 1718-20CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat21 3/4 x 17 in. (55.2 x 43.2 cm)

"Mezzetin" has this rare quality of museum paintings: being recognizable in reproduction and much more complex as soon as you look at the edges, gestures and silences. Antoine Watteau gives "Mezzetin" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Mezzetin", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Mezzetin" - ca. 1718-20; Oil on canvas; 21 3/4 x 17 in. (55.2 x 43.2 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Bashi-Bazouk, painting by Jean-Léon Gérôme at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #49
Jean-Leon Gérôme

Bashi-Bazouk

Date1868 -69CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat31 3/4 x 26 in. (80.6 x 66 cm)

In "Bashi-Bazouk", Jean-Léon Gérôme adjusts the distance precisely; the work first attracts, then forces you to slow down. Jean-Léon Gérôme gives "Bashi-Bazouk" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Bashi-Bazouk", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Bashi-Bazouk" - 1868-69; Oil on canvas; 31 3/4 x 26 in. (80.6 x 66 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Joséphine-Éléonore-Marie-Pauline de Galard de Brassac de Béarn (1825 -1860), Princess de Broglie, painting by Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #50
Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres

Joséphine-Éléonore-Marie-Pauline de Galard de Brassac de Béarn (1825 -1860), Princess de Broglie

Date1851 -53CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat47 3/4 × 35 3/4 in. (121.3 × 90.8 cm) Framed: 61 1/4 × 49 1/2 in. (155.6 × 125.7 cm)

The title "Joséphine-Éléonore-Marie-Pauline de Galard de Brassac de Béarn (1825 -1860), Princesse de Broglie" announces the motif, but Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres adds a visual structure which explains its lasting presence in the galleries of the Met. Ingres pushes the line, the fabric and the pose towards an elegance so precise that anatomy sometimes agrees to negotiate. In "Joséphine-Éléonore-Marie-Pauline de Galard de Brassac de Béarn (1825 -1860), Princesse de Broglie", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Joséphine-Éléonore-Marie-Pauline de Galard de Brassac de Béarn (1825 -1860), Princesse de Broglie", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better the strength of the image than its sole subject. Broglie" - 1851 -53; Oil on canvas; 47 3/4 × 35 3/4 in. (121.3 × 90.8 cm) Framed: 61 1/4 × 49 1/2 in. (155.6 × 125.7 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Joseph-Antoine Moltedo (born 1775), painting by Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #51
Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres

Joseph-Antoine Moltedo (born 1775)

Dateca. 1810CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat29 5/8 x 22 7/8 in. (75.2 x 58.1 cm)

In "Joseph-Antoine Moltedo (born 1775)", the first look seizes the subject; the second begins to understand how Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres organizes the meeting. Ingres pushes the line, the fabric and the pose towards an elegance so precise that anatomy sometimes agrees to negotiate. In "Joseph-Antoine Moltedo (born 1775)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Joseph-Antoine Moltedo (born 1775)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Joseph-Antoine Moltedo (born 1775)" - ca. 1810; Oil on canvas; 29 5/8 x 22 7/8 in. (75.2 x 58.1 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743 -1794) and Marie Anne Lavoisier (Marie Anne Pierrette Paulze, 1758 -1836), painting by Jacques Louis David at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #52
Jacques Louis David

Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743 -1794) and Marie Anne Lavoisier (Marie Anne Pierrette Paulze, 1758 -1836)

Date1788CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat102 1/4 x 76 5/8 in. (259.7 x 194.6 cm)

David orders gestures, profiles and architecture with a neoclassical clarity that gives each moral decision the clarity of a verdict. In "Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743 -1794) and Marie Anne Lavoisier (Marie Anne Pierrette Paulze, 1758 -1836)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743 -1794) and Marie Anne Lavoisier (Marie Anne Pierrette Paulze, 1758 -1836)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743 -1794) and Marie Anne Lavoisier (Marie Anne Pierrette Paulze, 1758 -1836)" - 1788; Oil on canvas; 102 1/4 x 76 5/8 in. (259.7 x 194.6 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -1792), painting by Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #53
Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes)

Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -1792)

Date1787 -88CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat50 x 40 in. (127 x 101.6 cm)

With "Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -1792)", Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes) transforms an identifiable motif into a construction of light, rhythm and presence. Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes) gives "Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -1792)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -1792)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. In "Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -1792)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -1792)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -1792)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -1792)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -1792)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Manuel Osorio Manrique de Zuniga (1784 -17

See the museum notice →
Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina, painting by Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #54
Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes)

Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina

Date1787 -88CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat76 3/4 x 45 1/4 in. (195 x 115 cm)

The visual success of "Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina" is due to an immediately readable composition which nevertheless continues to provide details after the regulatory ruling before the cartel. Goya (Francisco de Goya y Lucientes) gives "Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Condesa de Altamira and Her Daughter, Maria Agustina

See the museum notice →
The Fortune-Teller, painting by Georges de La Tour at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #55
Georges de La Tour

The Fortune-Teller

Dateprobably 1630sCollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat40 1/8 x 48 5/8 in. (101.9 x 123.5 cm)

"The Fortune-Teller" shows why Georges de La Tour remains essential to the Met's journey: the work tells, describes and organizes space without confusing abundance and disorder. Georges de La Tour gives "The Fortune-Teller" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "The Fortune-Teller", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "The Fortune-Teller" - probably 1630s; Oil on canvas; 40 1/8 x 48 5/8 in. (101.9 x 123.5 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun, painting by Nicolas Poussin at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #56
Nicolas Poussin

Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun

Date1658CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat46 7/8 x 72 in. (119.1 x 182.9 cm)

In front of "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun", the gaze moves from subject to material then returns to the subject with some additional information and, ideally, a little more battery. Nicolas Poussin gives "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The landscape of "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The landscape of "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The landscape of "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun" are based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun" are based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun" are based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun" are based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun" are based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "Blind Orion Searching for the Rising Sun" - 1658; Oil on canvas; 46 7/8 x 72 in. (119.1 x 182.9

See the museum notice →
The Abduction of the Sabine Women, painting by Nicolas Poussin at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #57
Nicolas Poussin

The Abduction of the Sabine Women

Dateprobably 1633 -34CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat60 7/8 x 82 5/8 in. (154.6 x 209.9 cm)

The place of "The Abduction of the Sabine Women" in the collection does not depend only on its author: Nicolas Poussin condenses an era, a technique and a singular way of addressing the viewer. Nicolas Poussin gives "The Abduction of the Sabine Women" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "The Abduction of the Sabine Women", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "The Abduction of the Sabine Women", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "The Abduction of the Sabine Women" - probably 1633 -34; Oil on canvas; 60 7/8 x 82 5/8 in. (154.6 x 209.9 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Mars and Venus United by Love, painting by Paolo Veronese (Paolo Caliari) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #58
Paolo Veronese (Paolo Caliari)

Mars and Venus United by Love

Date1570sCollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat81 x 63 3/8 in. (205.7 x 161 cm)

"Mars and Venus United by Love" has this rare quality of museum paintings: being recognizable in reproduction and much more complex as soon as you look at the edges, gestures and silences. Paolo Veronese (Paolo Caliari) gives "Mars and Venus United by Love" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Mars and Venus United by Love", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Mars and Venus United by Love", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "Mars and Venus United by Love" - 1570s; Oil on canvas; 81 x 63 3/8 in. (205.7 x 161 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Venus and Adonis, painting by Titian (Tiziano Vecellio) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #59
Titian (Tiziano Vecellio)

Venus and Adonis

Date1550sCollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat42 x 52 1/2 in. (106.7 x 133.4 cm)

In "Venus and Adonis", Titian (Tiziano Vecellio) adjusts the distance precisely; the work first attracts, then forces you to slow down. Titian (Tiziano Vecellio) gives "Venus and Adonis" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Venus and Adonis", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Venus and Adonis" - 1550s; Oil on canvas; 42 x 52 1/2 in. (106.7 x 133.4 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Last Communion of Saint Jerome, painting by Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano Filipepi) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #60
Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano Filipepi)

The Last Communion of Saint Jerome

Dateearly 1490sCollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat13 1/2 x 10 in. (34.3 x 25.4 cm)

The title "The Last Communion of Saint Jerome" announces the motif, but Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano Filipepi) adds a visual structure which explains its lasting presence in the Met galleries. Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano Filipepi) gives "The Last Communion of Saint Jerome" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "The Last Communion of Saint Jerome" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought legend. The iconography of "The Last Communion of Saint Jerome" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought legend. The iconography of "The Last Communion of Saint Jerome" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought legend. The iconography of "The Last Communion of Saint Jerome" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought legend. The iconography of "The Last Communion of Saint Jerome" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought legend. The iconography of "The Last Communion of Saint Jerome" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by a caption plastered after the fact. The official landmarks of "The Last Communion of Saint Jerome" - early 1490s; Tempera and gold on wood; 13 1/2 x 10 in. (34.3 x 25.4 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
IV
Renaissance, Baroque and Golden Age

Botticelli, Duccio, Giotto, Van Eyck, Holbein, Raphael, Rubens and the Caravaggesques install devotion, portrait and chiaroscuro in the galleries.

The Annunciation, painting by Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano Filipepi) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #61
Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano Filipepi)

The Annunciation

Dateca. 1490CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat7 1/2 x 12 3/8 in. (19.1 x 31.4 cm)

In "The Annunciation", the first look captures the subject; the second begins to understand how Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano Filipepi) organizes the meeting. Botticelli (Alessandro di Mariano Filipepi) gives "The Annunciation" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "The Annunciation" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by a caption plastered after the fact. The official landmarks of "The Annunciation" - ca. 1490; Tempera and gold on wood; 7 1/2 x 12 3/8 in. (19.1 x 31.4 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Madonna and Child, painting by Duccio di Buoninsegna at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #62
Duccio di Buoninsegna

Madonna and Child

Dateca. 1290 -1300CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatOverall, with engaged frame, 11 x 8 1/4 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (23.8 x 16.5 cm)

Duccio combines a gold background, a flexible line and emotion chosen to make devotion a meeting at eye level. The iconography of "Madonna and Child" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by a caption given after the fact. The official markers of "Madonna and Child" - ca. 1290 -1300; Tempera and gold on wood; Overall, with engaged frame, 11 x 8 1/4 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (27.9 x 21 cm); painted surface 9 3/8 x 6 1/2 in. (27.

See the museum notice →
The Adoration of the Magi, painting by Giotto di Bondone at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #63
Giotto di Bondone

The Adoration of the Magi

Datepossibly ca. 1320CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat17 3/4 x 17 1/4 in. (45.1 x 43.8 cm)

With "The Adoration of the Magi", Giotto di Bondone transforms an identifiable motif into a construction of light, rhythm and presence. Giotto di Bondone gives "The Adoration of the Magi" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "The Adoration of the Magi" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought legend. The official landmarks of "The Adoration of the Magi" - possibly ca. 1320; Tempera on wood, gold ground; 17 3/4 x 17 1/4 in. (45.1 x 43.8 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Crucifixion; The Last Judgment, painting by Jan van Eyck at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #64
Jan van Eyck

The Crucifixion; The Last Judgment

Dateca. 1436 -38CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatEach 22 1/4 x 7 2/3 in. (56.5 x 19.7 cm)

The visual success of "The Crucifixion; The Last Judgment" is due to an immediately readable composition which nevertheless continues to provide details after the regulatory ruling before the cartel. Jan van Eyck gives "The Crucifixion; The Last Judgment" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "The Crucifixion; The Last Judgment" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought caption. The official landmarks of "The Crucifixion; The Last Judgment" become readable through gestures, attributes and hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought caption. The official landmarks of "The Crucifixion; The Last Judgment" become readable by gestures, attributes and hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought ca. 1436-38; Oil on canvas, transferred from wood; Each 22 1/4 x 7 2/3 in. (56.5 x 19.7 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece), painting by Robert Campin at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #65
Robert Campin

Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece)

Dateca. 1427 -32CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatOverall (open): 25 3/8 x 46 3/8 in. (64.5 x 117.8 cm) Central panel: 25 1/4 x 24 7/8 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm

"Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece)" shows why Robert Campin remains essential to the Met's journey: the work tells, describes and organizes space without confusing abundance and disorder. Robert Campin gives "Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece)" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought legend. The iconography of "Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece)" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought legend. The iconography of "Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece)" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought legend. The official landmarks of "Annunciation Triptych (Merode Altarpiece)" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by a caption. 1427-32; Oil on oak; Overall (open): 25 3/8 x 46 3/8 in. (64.5 x 117.8 cm) Central panel: 25 1/4 x 24 7/8 in. (64.1 x 63.2 cm) each wing: 25 3/8 x 10 3/4 in. (64.5 x 27.3 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
A Goldsmith in his Shop, painting by Petrus Christus at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #66
Petrus Christus

A Goldsmith in his Shop

Date1449CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatOverall 39 3/8 x 33 3/4 in. (100.1 x 85.8 cm); painted surface 38 5/8 x 33 1/2 in. (98 x 85.8 cm)

In front of "A Goldsmith in his Shop", the gaze moves from subject to material then returns to the subject with some additional information and, ideally, a little more battery. Petrus Christus gives "A Goldsmith in his Shop" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The technique of "A Goldsmith in his Shop" favors line, flat areas and precious details; it requires closer reading than oil on canvas. The official benchmarks of "A Goldsmith in his Shop" - 1449; Oil on oak panel; Overall 39 3/8 x 33 3/4 in. (100.1 x 85.8 cm); painted surface 38 5/8 x 33 3/4 in. (100.1 x 85.8 cm); The official benchmarks of "A Goldsmith in his Shop" - 1449; Oil on oak panel; Overall 39 3/8 x 33 3/4 in. (100.1 x 85.8 cm); painted surface 38 5/8 x 33 3/4 in. (100.1 x 85.8 cm); Painted surface 38 5/8 x 33 3/4 in. (100.1 x 85.8 cm); The official benchmarks of "A Goldsmith in his Shop" - 1449; Oil on oak panel; Overall 39 3/8 x 33 3/4 in. (100.1 x 85.8 cm); Painted surface 38 5/8 x 33 3/4 in. (100.1 x 8

See the museum notice →
Portrait of a Carthusian, painting by Petrus Christus at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #67
Petrus Christus

Portrait of a Carthusian

Date1446CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatOverall 11 1/2 x 8 1/2 in. (29.2 x 21.6 cm); painted surface 11 1/2 x 7 3/8 in. (29.2 x 21.6 cm); painted surface 11 1/2 x 7 3/8 in. (29.2 x 18.7 cm)

The place of "Portrait of a Carthusian" in the collection does not depend only on its author: Petrus Christus condenses an era, a technique and a singular way of addressing the viewer. Petrus Christus gives "Portrait of a Carthusian" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Portrait of a Carthusian", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Portrait of a Carthusian" - 1446; Oil on oak; Overall 11 1/2 x 8 1/2 in. (29.2 x 21.6 cm); Painted surface 11 1/2 x 8 1/2 in. (29.2 x 21.6 cm); Painted surface 11 1/2 x 8 1/2 in. (29.2 x 21.6 cm); Painted surface 11 1/2 x 8 1/2 in. (29.2 x 21.6 cm); Painted surface 11 1/2 x 8 1/2 in. (29.2 x 21.6 cm); Painted surface 11 1/2 x 8 1/2 in. (29.2 x 21.6 cm); Painted surface 11 1/2 x 8 1/2 in. (29.2 x 21.6 cm); Painted surface 11 1/2 x 8 1/2 in. (29.2 x 21.6 cm); 1446; Oil on oak; Overall

See the museum notice →
The Annunciation, painting by Hans Memling at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #68
Hans Memling

The Annunciation

Dateca. 1465 -70CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat73 1/4 x 45 1/4 in. (186.1 x 114.9 cm)

"The Annunciation" has this rare quality of museum paintings: being recognizable in reproduction and much more complex as soon as you look at the edges, gestures and silences. Hans Memling gives "The Annunciation" a precise identity through the drawing, color and way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "The Annunciation" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by a caption plastered after the fact. The official landmarks of "The Annunciation" - ca. 1465 -70; Oil on wood; 73 1/4 x 45 1/4 in. (186.1 x 114.9 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Hermann von Wedigh III (died 1560), painting by Hans Holbein the Younger at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #69
Hans Holbein the Younger

Hermann von Wedigh III (died 1560)

Date1532CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat16 5/8 x 12 3/4 in. (42.2 x 32.4 cm), with added strip of 1/2 in. (1.3 cm) at bottom

In "Hermann von Wedigh III (died 1560)", Hans Holbein the Younger adjusts the distance precisely; the work first attracts, then forces you to slow down. Hans Holbein the Younger gives "Hermann von Wedigh III (died 1560)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Hermann von Wedigh III (died 1560)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Hermann von Wedigh III (died 1560)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Hermann von Wedigh III (died 1560)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Hermann von Wedigh III (died 1560)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Hermann von Wedigh III (died 1560)", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Hermann von Wedigh III (died 1560)" - 1532; Oil and gold on oak; 16 5/8 x 12 3/4 in. (42.2 x 32.4 cm), with added strip of 1/2 in. (42.2 x 32.4 cm), with added strip of 1/2 in. (42.2 x 32.4 cm),

See the museum notice →
Erasmus of Rotterdam, painting by Hans Holbein the Younger at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #70
Hans Holbein the Younger

Erasmus of Rotterdam

Dateca. 1532CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat7 1/4 x 5 9/16 in. (18.4 x 14.2 cm); painted surface 6 15/16 x 5 1/2 in. (17.6 x 14.2 cm)

The title "Erasmus of Rotterdam" announces the motif, but Hans Holbein the Younger adds a visual structure which explains its lasting presence in the galleries of the Met. Hans Holbein the Younger gives "Erasmus of Rotterdam" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Erasmus of Rotterdam", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Erasmus of Rotterdam" - ca. 1532; Oil on linden panel; 7 1/4 x 5 9/16 in. (18.4 x 14.2 cm); painted surface 6 15/16 x 5 1/2 in. (18.4 x 14.2 cm); painted surface 6 15/16 x 5 1/16 in. (18.4 x 14.2 cm); painted surface 6 15/16 x 5 1/16 in. (18.4 x 14.2 cm); oil on linden panel; 7 1/4 x 5 9/16 in. (18.4 x 14.2 cm); painted surface 6 15/16 x 5 1/2 in. (18.4 x 14.2 cm); 1532; Oil on linden panel; 7 1/4 x 5 9/16 in. (18.4 x 14.2 cm); painted surface 6 15/16 x 5 1/2 in. (18.4

See the museum notice →
Virgin and Child with Saint Anne, painting by Albrecht Dürer at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #71
Albrecht Durer

Virgin and Child with Saint Anne

Dateprobably 1519CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat23 5/8 x 19 5/8 in. (60 x 49.8 cm)

In "Virgin and Child with Saint Anne", the first look captures the subject; the second begins to understand how Albrecht Dürer organizes the meeting. Albrecht Dürer gives "Virgin and Child with Saint Anne" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "Virgin and Child with Saint Anne" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought legend. The iconography of "Virgin and Child with Saint Anne" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought legend. The official landmarks of "Virgin and Child with Saint Anne" - probably 1519; Oil on linden; 23 5/8 x 19 5/8 in. (60 x 49.8 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Meditation on the Passion, painting by Vittore Carpaccio at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #72
Vittore Carpaccio

The Meditation on the Passion

Dateca. 1490CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatOverall 27 3/4 x 34 1/8in. (70.5 x 86.7cm); painted surface 26 3/16 × 33 1/4 in. (66.5 × 84.5 cm)

Vittore Carpaccio gives "The Meditation on the Passion" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The technique of "The Meditation on the Passion" favors line, flat areas and precious details; it requires closer reading than oil on canvas. The official benchmarks of "The Meditation on the Passion" - ca. 1490; Oil and tempera on wood; Overall 27 3/4 x 34 1/8in. (70.5 x 86.7cm); painted surface 26 3/16 × 33 1/4 in. (66.5 × 84.5 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Adoration of the Shepherds, painting by Andrea Mantegna at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #73
Andrea Mantegna

The Adoration of the Shepherds

Dateshortly after 1450CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatOverall 15 3/4 x 21 7/8 in. (40 x 55.6 cm); painted surface 14 7/8 x 21 in. (37.8 x 55.6 cm); painted surface 14 7/8 x 21 in. (37.8 x 55.6 cm)

With "The Adoration of the Shepherds", Andrea Mantegna transforms an identifiable motif into a construction of light, rhythm and presence. Andrea Mantegna gives "The Adoration of the Shepherds" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "The Adoration of the Shepherds" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought caption. The official landmarks of "The Adoration of the Shepherd" - shortly after 1450; Tempera on canvas, transferred from wood; Overall 15 3/4 x 21 7/8 in. (40 x 55.6 cm); painted surface 14 7/8 x 21 in. (40 x 55.6 cm); The Adoration of the Shepherds" - quickly after 1450; Tempera on canvas, transferred from wood; Overall 15 3/4 x 21 7/8 in. (40 x 55.6 cm); painted surface 14 7/8 x 21 7/8 in. (40 x 55.6 cm); The Adoration of the Shepherds" - quickly after 1450; Tempera on canvas, transferred from wood; Overall 15 3/4 x 21 7/8 in. (40 x 55.6 cm); The Adoration of the Shepherds" - quickly after 1450; Tempera on canvas, transferred from wood; Overall 15 3/4 x 21 7/8 in. (40 x 55.6 cm); The Adoration of the Shepherds" - quickly after 1450; Temper

See the museum notice →
Madonna and Child Enthroned with Saints, painting by Raphael (Raffaello Sanzio or Santi) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #74
Raphael (Raffaello Sanzio or Santi)

Madonna and Child Enthroned with Saints

Dateca. 1504CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatMain panel, overall 67 7/8 x 67 7/8 in. (172.4 x 172.4 cm), painted surface 66 3/4 x 66 1/2 in. (169.5 x 168.9 cm) Glasses, overall 29 1/2 x 70 7/8 in. (74.9 x 180 cm), painted surface 25 1/2 x 67 1/2 in. (169.5 x 168.9 cm), overall 29 1/2 x 70 7/8 in. (74.9 x 180 cm), painted surface 25 1/2 x 67 1/2 in. (64.8 x 171.5 cm)

The visual success of "Madonna and Child Enthroned with Saints" is due to an immediately readable composition which nevertheless continues to provide details after the regulatory ruling before the cartel. Raphael (Raffaello Sanzio or Santi) gives "Madonna and Child Enthroned with Saints" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "Madonna and Child Enthroned with Saints" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought legend. The iconography of "Madonna and Child Enthroned with Saints" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought legend. The iconography of "Madonna and Child Enthroned with Saints" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought legend. The official landmarks of "Madonna and Child Enthroned with Saints" - ca. 1504; Oil and gold on wood; Main panel, overall 67 7/8 x 67 7/8 in. (172.4 x 172.4 cm), painted surface 66 3/4 x 66 1/2 in. (169.5 x 168.9 cm) Glasses, overall 29 1/2 x 70 7/8 in. (74.9 x 180 cm), painted surface 25 1/2 x 67 1/2 in. (64.8 x 180 cm), painted surface 25 1/2 x 67 1/2 in. (64.8 x 171.5 cm).

See the museum notice →
Rubens, Helena Fourment (1614 -1673), and Their Son Frans (1633 -1678), painting by Peter Paul Rubens at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #75
Peter paul rubens

Rubens, Helena Fourment (1614 -1673), and Their Son Frans (1633 -1678)

Dateca. 1635CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat80 1/4 x 62 1/4 in. (203.8 x 158.1 cm)

"Rubens, Helena Fourment (1614 -1673), and Their Son Frans (1633 -1678)" shows why Peter Paul Rubens remains essential to the Met's journey: the work tells, describes and organizes space without confusing abundance and disorder. Peter Paul Rubens gives "Rubens, Helena Fourment (1614 -1673), and Their Son Frans (1633 -1678)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Rubens, Helena Fourment (1614 -1673), and Their Son Frans (1633 -1678)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Rubens, Helena Fourment (1614 -1673), and Their Son Frans (1633 -1678)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Rubens, Helena Fourment (1614 -1673), and Their Son Frans (1633 -1678)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Rubens, Helena Fourment (1614 -1673), and Their Son Frans (1633 -1678)", a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Rubens, Helena Fourment (1614 -1673), and Their Son Frans (1633 -1678)", and Their Son Frans ( (1633 -1678)" - ca. 1635; Oil on wood; 80 1/4 x 62 1/4 in. (203.8 x 158.1 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Samson Captured by the Philistines, painting by Guercino (Giovanni Francesco Barbieri) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #76
Guercino (Giovanni Francesco Barbieri)

Samson Captured by the Philistines

Date1619CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat75 1/4 x 93 1/4 in. (191.1 x 236.9 cm)

In front of "Samson Captured by the Philistines", the gaze moves from subject to material then returns to the subject with some additional information and, ideally, a little more drums. Guercino (Giovanni Francesco Barbieri) gives "Samson Captured by the Philistines" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Samson Captured by the Philistines", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Samson Captured by the Philistines", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Samson Captured by the Philistines" - 1619; Oil on canvas; 75 1/4 x 93 1/4 in. (191.1 x 236.9 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Immaculate Conception, painting by Guido Reni at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #77
Guido Reni

The Immaculate Conception

Date1627CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat105 1/2 x 73 in. (268 x 185.4 cm)

The place of "The Immaculate Conception" in the collection does not depend only on its author: Guido Reni condenses an era, a technique and a singular way of addressing the viewer. Guido Reni gives "The Immaculate Conception" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "The Immaculate Conception", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "The Immaculate Conception", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "The Immaculate Conception" - 1627; Oil on canvas; 105 1/2 x 73 in. (268 x 185.4 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Coronation of the Virgin, painting by Annibale Carracci at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #78
Annibale Carracci

The Coronation of the Virgin

Dateafter 1595CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat46 3/8 x 55 5/8 in. (117.8 x 141.3 cm)

"The Coronation of the Virgin" has this rare quality of museum paintings: being recognizable in reproduction and much more complex as soon as you look at the edges, gestures and silences. Annibale Carracci gives "The Coronation of the Virgin" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "The Coronation of the Virgin", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "The Coronation of the Virgin", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "The Coronation of the Virgin" - after 1595; Oil on canvas; 46 3/8 x 55 5/8 in. (117.8 x 141.3 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Crucifixion with the Virgin and Saint John, painting by Hendrick ter Brugghen at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #79
Hendrick ter Brugghen

The Crucifixion with the Virgin and Saint John

Dateca. 1624 -25CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat61 in. × 40 1/4 in. (154.9 × 102.2 cm)

In "The Crucifixion with the Virgin and Saint John", Hendrick ter Brugghen adjusts the distance precisely; the work first attracts, then forces you to slow down. Hendrick ter Brugghen gives "The Crucifixion with the Virgin and Saint John" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "The Crucifixion with the Virgin and Saint John" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought legend. The iconography of "The Crucifixion with the Virgin and Saint John" becomes readable by gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not by an afterthought legend. The official landmarks of "The Crucifixion with the Virgin and Saint John" - ca. 1624-25; Oil on canvas; 61 in. × 40 1/4 in. (154.9 × 102.2 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Merrymakers at Shrovetide, painting by Frans Hals at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #80
Frans Hals

Merrymakers at Shrovetide

Dateca. 1616 -17CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat51 3/4 x 39 1/4 in. (131.4 x 99.7 cm)

The title "Merrymakers at Shrovetide" announces the motif, but Frans Hals adds a visual structure which explains its lasting presence in the Met galleries. Frans Hals gives "Merrymakers at Shrovetide" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Merrymakers at Shrovetide", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Merrymakers at Shrovetide" - ca. 1616-17; Oil on canvas; 51 3/4 x 39 1/4 in. (131.4 x 99.7 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
V
Asian landscapes, faces and horizons

The last twenty works move from the Netherlands to Spain and France before ending with four major paintings from China and Japan.

Wheat Fields, painting by Jacob van Ruisdael at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #81
Jacob van Ruisdael

Wheat Fields

Dateca. 1670CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat39 3/8 x 51 1/4 in. (100 x 130.2 cm)

In "Wheat Fields", the first look captures the subject; the second begins to understand how Jacob van Ruisdael organizes the meeting. Jacob van Ruisdael gives "Wheat Fields" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The landscape of "Wheat Fields" is based on depth, weather and the circulation of light rather than on a simple setting. The official landmarks of "Wheat Fields" - ca. 1670; Oil on canvas; 39 3/8 x 51 1/4 in. (100 x 130.2 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Leisure Time in an Elegant Setting, painting by Pieter de Hooch at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #82
Pieter de Hooch

Leisure Time in an Elegant Setting

Dateca. 1663-65CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatExtended canvas 22 15/16 x 27 5/16 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm); original visible painted surface 21 5/8 x 26 in. (55 x 66 cm)

Pieter de Hooch gives "Leisure Time in an Elegant Setting" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Leisure Time in an Elegant Setting", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Leisure Time in an Elegant Setting" - ca. 1663-65; Oil on canvas; Extended canvas 22 15/16 x 27 5/16 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm); Original visible painted surface 21 5/8 x 26 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm); Original visible painted surface 21 5/8 x 26 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm); Original visible painted surface 21 5/8 x 26 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm); Original visible painted surface 21 5/8 x 26 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm); Extended canvas 22 15/16 x 27 5/16 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm); Extended canvas 22 15/16 x 27 5/16 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm); Extended canvas 22 15/16 x 27 5/16 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm); Extended canvas 22 15/16 x 27 5/16 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm); Extended canvas 22 15/16 x 27 5/16 in. (58.3 x 69.4 cm);

See the museum notice →
Merry Company on a Terrace, painting by Jan Steen at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #83
Jan Steen

Merry Company on a Terrace

Dateca. 1670CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat55 1/2 x 51 3/4 in. (141 x 131.4 cm)

With "Merry Company on a Terrace", Jan Steen transforms an identifiable motif into a construction of light, rhythm and presence. Jan Steen gives "Merry Company on a Terrace" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Merry Company on a Terrace", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Merry Company on a Terrace" - ca. 1670; Oil on a Terrace", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Merry Company on a Terrace" - ca. 1670; Oil on a Terrace", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "Merry Company on a Terrace" - ca. 1670; Oil on canvas; 55 1/2 x 51 3/4 in. (141 x 131.4 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Young Virgin, painting by Francisco de Zurbaran at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #84
Francisco de Zurbaran

The Young Virgin

Dateca. 1632 -33CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat46 x 37 in. (116.8 x 94 cm)

The visual success of "The Young Virgin" is due to an immediately readable composition which nevertheless continues to provide details after the regulatory ruling before the cartel. Francisco de Zurbaran gives "The Young Virgin" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "The Young Virgin", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official landmarks of "The Young Virgin" - ca. 1632-33; Oil on canvas; 46 x 37 in. (116.8 x 94 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Saint Jerome as Scholar, painting by El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #85
El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos)

Saint Jerome as Scholar

Dateca. 1610CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat42 1/2 x 35 1/16 in. (108 x 89 cm)

"Saint Jerome as Scholar" shows why El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos) remains essential to the Met's journey: the work tells, describes and organizes space without confusing abundance and disorder. El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos) gives "Saint Jerome as Scholar" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The iconography of "Saint Jerome as Scholar" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought legend. The iconography of "Saint Jerome as Scholar" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought legend. The iconography of "Saint Jerome as Scholar" becomes readable through gestures, attributes and the hierarchy of figures, not through an afterthought legend. The official landmarks of "Saint Jerome as Scholar" - ca. 1610; Oil on canvas; 42 1/2 x 35 1/16 in. (108 x 89 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609), painting by El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos) at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #86
El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos)

Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609)

Dateca. 1600CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat67 1/4 x 42 1/2in. (170.8 x 108cm)

In front of "Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609)", the gaze moves from subject to matter then returns to the subject with some additional information and, ideally, a little more battery. El Greco (Domenikos Theotokopoulos) gives "Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better the strength of the image than its sole subject. The official references of "Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better the strength of the image than its sole subject. The official references of "Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better the strength of the image than its sole subject. The official references of "Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better the strength of the image than its sole subject. The official references of "Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better the strength of the image than its sole subject. The official references of "Cardinal Fernando Niño de Guevara (1541 -1609)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better

See the museum notice →
Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Marie Gabrielle Capet (1761 -1818) and Marie Marguerite Carraux de Rosemond (1765 -1788), painting by Adélaïde Labille-Guiard at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #87
Adelaide Labille-Guiard

Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Marie Gabrielle Capet (1761 -1818) and Marie Marguerite Carraux de Rosemond (1765 -1788)

Date1785CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat83 x 59 1/2 in. (210.8 x 151.1 cm)

The place of "Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Marie Gabrielle Capet (1761 -1818) and Marie Marguerite Carraux de Rosemond (1765 -1788)" in the collection does not depend only on its author: Adélaïde Labille-Guiard condenses an era, a technique and a unique way of addressing the viewer. Adélaïde Labille-Guiard gives "Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Marie Gabrielle Capet (1761 -1818) and Marie Marguerite Carraux de Rosemond (1765 -1788)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Marie Gabrielle Capet (1761 -1818) and Marie Marguerite Carraux de Rosemond (1765 -1788)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Marie Gabrielle Capet (1761 -1818) and Marie Marguerite Carraux de Rosemond (1765 -1788)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Marie Gabrielle Capet (1761 -1818) and Marie Marguerite Carraux de Rosemond (1765 -1788)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Marie Gabrielle Capet (1761 -1818) and Marie Marguerite Carraux de Rosemond (1765 -1788)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official references of "Self-Portrait with Two Pupils, Marie Gabrielle Capet (1761 -1818) and Marie Marguerite Carraux de Rosemond (1765 -1788)" - 1785; Oil on canvas; 83 x 59 1/2 in. (210.8 x 151.1 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Countess of La Châtre (Marie Charlotte Louise Perrette Aglaé Bontemps, 1762 -1848), painting by Elisabeth Louise Vigée Le Brun at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #88
Elisabeth Louise Vigée Le Brun

Countess de la Châtre (Marie Charlotte Louise Perrette Aglaé Bontemps, 1762 -1848)

Date1789CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat45 x 34 1/2 in. (114.3 x 87.6 cm)

"Comtesse de la Châtre (Marie Charlotte Louise Perrette Aglaé Bontemps, 1762 -1848)" has this rare quality of museum paintings: being recognizable in reproduction and much more complex as soon as you look at the edges, gestures and silences. Elisabeth Louise Vigée Le Brun gives "Comtesse de la Châtre (Marie Charlotte Louise Perrette Aglaé Bontemps, 1762 -1848)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Comtesse de la Châtre (Marie Charlotte Louise Perrette Aglaé Bontemps, 1762 -1848)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Comtesse de la Châtre (Marie Charlotte Louise Perrette Aglaé Bontemps, 1762 -1848)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Comtesse de la Châtre (Marie Charlotte Louise Perrette Aglaé Bontemps, 1762 -1848)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention in the frame. In "Comtesse de la Châtre (Marie Charlotte Louise Perrette Aglaé Bontemps, 1762 -1848)", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The landmarks officials of "Comtesse de la Châtre (Marie Charlotte Louise Perrette Aglaé Bontemps, 1762 -1848)" - 1789; Oil on canvas; 45 x 34 1/2 in. (114.3 x 87.6 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby, painting by Sir Thomas Lawrence at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #89
Sir thomas lawrence

Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby

Date1790CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat94 in. × 57 1/2 in. (238.8 × 146.1 cm)

In "Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby", Sir Thomas Lawrence adjusts the distance precisely; the work first attracts, then forces you to slow down. Sir Thomas Lawrence gives "Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better the strength of the image than its sole subject. The official references of "Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better the strength of the image than its sole subject. In "Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better the strength of the image than its sole subject. The official references of "Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby", the relationships between figures, space and light explain better the strength of the image than its sole subject. The official references of "Elizabeth Farren (born about 1759, died 1829), Later Countess of Derby", the relationships between figures, space and light

See the museum notice →
Hagar in the Wilderness, painting by Camille Corot at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #90
Camille Corot

Hagar in the Wilderness

Date1835CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat71 x 106 1/2 in. (180.3 x 270.5 cm)

The title "Hagar in the Wilderness" announces the motif, but Camille Corot adds a visual structure which explains its lasting presence in the Met galleries. Camille Corot gives "Hagar in the Wilderness" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Hagar in the Wilderness", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Hagar in the Wilderness" - 1835; Oil on canvas; 71 x 106 1/2 in. (180.3 x 270.5 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Sibylle, painting by Camille Corot at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #91
Camille Corot

Sibyl

Dateca. 1870CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat32 1/4 x 25 1/2 in. (81.9 x 64.8 cm)

In "Sibylle", the first look captures the subject; the second begins to understand how Camille Corot organizes the meeting. Camille Corot gives "Sibylle" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Sibylle", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Sibylle" - ca. 1870; Oil on canvas; 32 1/4 x 25 1/2 in. (81.9 x 64.8 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Jalais Hill, Pontoise, painting by Camille Pissarro at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #92
Camille Pissarro

Jalais Hill, Pontoise

Date1867CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat34 1/4 x 45 1/4 in. (87 x 114.9 cm)

Camille Pissarro gives "Jalais Hill, Pontoise" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Jalais Hill, Pontoise", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Jalais Hill, Pontoise" - 1867; Oil on canvas; 34 1/4 x 45 1/4 in. (87 x 114.9 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Haystacks: Autumn, painting by Jean-François Millet at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #93
Jean-Francois Millet

Haystacks: Autumn

Dateca. 1874CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat33 1/2 x 43 3/8 in. (85.1 x 110.2 cm)

With "Haystacks: Autumn", Jean-François Millet transforms an identifiable motif into a construction of light, rhythm and presence. Jean-François Millet gives "Haystacks: Autumn" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Haystacks: Autumn", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Haystacks: Autumn" - ca. 1874; Oil on canvas; 33 1/2 x 43 3/8 in. (85.1 x 110.2 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
The Forest in Winter at Sunset, painting by Théodore Rousseau at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #94
Theodore Rousseau

The Forest in Winter at Sunset

Dateca. 1846-67CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat64 x 102 3/8 in. (162.6 x 260 cm)

The visual success of "The Forest in Winter at Sunset" is due to an immediately readable composition which nevertheless continues to provide details after the regulatory ruling before the cartel. Théodore Rousseau gives "The Forest in Winter at Sunset" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "The Forest in Winter at Sunset", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. In "The Forest in Winter at Sunset", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official benchmarks of "The Forest in Winter at Sunset" - ca. 1846-67; Oil on canvas; 64 x 102 3/8 in. (162.6 x 260 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Young Ladies of the Village, painting by Gustave Courbet at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #95
Gustave Courbet

Young Ladies of the Village

Date1851 -52CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat76 3/4 x 102 3/4 in. (194.9 x 261 cm)

"Young Ladies of the Village" shows why Gustave Courbet remains essential to the Met's journey: the work tells, describes and organizes space without confusing abundance and disorder. Courbet gives reality a material weight: faces, rocks, fabrics and earth occupy the canvas without asking to be embellished. In "Young Ladies of the Village", the relationships between figures, space and light explain the strength of the image better than its sole subject. The official references of "Young Ladies of the Village" - 1851-52; Oil on canvas; 76 3/4 x 102 3/4 in. (194.9 x 261 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Woman with a Parrot, painting by Gustave Courbet at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #96
Gustave Courbet

Woman with a Parrot

Date1866CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormat51 x 77 in. (129.5 x 195.6 cm)

In front of "Woman with a Parrot", the gaze moves from subject to material then returns to the subject with some additional information and, ideally, a little more battery. Courbet gives reality material weight: faces, rocks, fabrics and earth occupy the canvas without asking to be embellished. In "Woman with a Parrot", pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Woman with a Parrot" - 1866; Oil on canvas; pose, clothing, hands and gaze construct a social identity as much as a face. The official landmarks of "Woman with a Parrot" - 1866; Oil on canvas; 51 x 77 in. (129.5 x 195.6 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges), painting by Ogata Kôrin at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #97
Ogata Korin

Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges)

Dateafter 1709CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatImage (each screen): 64 7/16 in. x 11ft. 6 3/4 in. (163.7 x 352.4 cm) Overall (each screen): 70 1/2 in. x 12 ft. 2 1/4 in. (163.7 x 352.4 cm) Overall (each screen): 70 1/2 in. x 12 ft. 2 1/4 in. (163.7 x 352.4 cm) Overall (each screen): 70 1/2 in. x 12 ft. 2 1/4 in. (179.1 x 371.5 cm)

The place of "Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges)" in the collection does not depend only on its author: Ogata Kôrin condenses an era, a technique and a singular way of addressing the viewer. Ogata Kôrin gives "Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges)" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. In "Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges)", objects, flowers or fruits allow color, texture and duration to be measured with a precision that makes the table surprisingly ambitious. In "Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges)", objects, flowers or fruits allow color, texture and duration to be measured with a precision that makes the table surprisingly ambitious. In "Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges)", objects, flowers or fruits allow color, texture and duration to be measured with a precision that makes the table surprisingly ambitious. In "Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges)", objects, flowers or fruits allow color, texture and duration to be measured with a precision that makes the table surprisingly ambitious. In "Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges)", objects, flowers or fruits allow color, texture and duration to be measured with a precision that makes the table surprisingly ambitious. In "Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges)", objects, flowers or fruits allow color, texture and duration to be measured with a precision that makes the table surprisingly ambitious. The official benchmarks of "Irises at Yatsuhashi (Eight Bridges)", objects, flowers or fruits allow color, texture and duration to be measured with a precision that makes the table surprisingly ambitious. In "Irises at Yatsuhashi (E paper; Image (each screen): 64 7/16 in. x 11ft. 6 3/4 in. (163.7 x 352.4 cm) Overall (each screen): 70 1/2 in. x 12 ft. 2 1/4 in. (163.7 x 352.4 cm) Overall (each screen): 70 1/2 in. x 12 ft. 2 1/4 in. (179.1 x 371.5 cm) - identify it without enclosing it in a general formula.

See the museum notice →
Old Plum, painting by Kano Sansetsu at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #98
Kano Sansetsu

Old Plum

Date1646CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatOverall (of all four panels): 68 3/4 x 191 1/8 in. (174.6 x 485.5 cm) Overall (a): 68 3/8 x 47 5/8 in. (173.7 x 121 cm) Overall (b): 68 3/8 x 47 5/8 in. (173.7 x 121 cm) Overall (b): 68 3/8 x 48 3/4 in. (173.7 x 121 cm) Overall (b): 68 3/8 x 48 3/4 in. (173.7 x 121 cm) Overall (b): 68 3/8 x 48 3/4 in. (173.7 x 121 cm) Overall (b): 68 3/8 x 48 3/4 in. (173.7 x 121 cm) Overall (b): 68 3/8 x 48 3/4 in. (173.7 x 121 cm) Overall (b): 68 3/8 x 48 3/4 in. (173.7 x 121 cm) Overall (b): 68 3/8 x 48 3/4 in. (173.7 x 121 cm) Overall (b): 68 3/8 x 48 3/4 in. (173

"Old Plum" has this rare quality of museum paintings: being recognizable in reproduction and much more complex as soon as you look at the edges, gestures and silences. Kano Sansetsu gives "Old Plum" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The "Old Plum" technique favors line, flat areas and precious details; it requires closer reading than oil on canvas. The "Old Plum" technique favors line, flat areas and precious details; it requires closer reading than oil on canvas. The official "Old Plum" landmarks - 1646; Four sliding-door panels (fusuma); ink, color, gold, and gold leaf on paper; Overall (of all four panels): 68 3/4 x 191 1/8 in. (174.6 x 485.5 cm) Overall (a): 68 3/4 x 191 1/8 in. (174.6 x 485.5 cm) Overall (of all four panels): 68 3/4 x 191 1/8 in. (174.6 x 485.5 cm) Overall (of all four panels): 68 3/4 x 191 1/8 in. (174.6 x 485.5 cm) Overall (of all four panels): 68 3/4 x 191 1/8 in. (174.6 x 485.5 cm) Overall (of all four panels): 68 3/4 x 191 1/8 in. (174.6 cm) Overall (b): 68 3/8 x 48 3/4 in. (173.7 x 123.8 cm) Overall (c): 68 1/2 x 47 3/4 in. (174 x 121.3 cm) Overall (d): 68 1/2 x 47 3/4 in. (174 x 121.3 cm) Overall (d): 68 1/2 x 47 3/4 in. (174 x 121.3 cm) Overall (d): 68 1/2 x 47 3/4 in. (174 x 121.3 cm) Overall (d): 68 1/2 x 47 3/4 in. (174 x 121.3 cm) Overall (d): 68 1/2 x 47 3/4 in. (174 x 121.3 cm) Overall (d): 68 1/2 x 47 3/4 in. (174 x 121.3 cm) Overall (d): 68 1/2 x 47 3/4 in. (174 x 121.3 cm) Overall (d): 68 1/2 x 47 3/4 in. (174 x 121.3 cm) Overall (d): 68 1/2 x 47 3/4 in. (174 x

See the museum notice →
Rough Waves, painting by Ogata Kôrin at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #99
Ogata Korin

Rough Waves

Dateca. 1704-9CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatImage: 57 11/16 × 65 1/8 in. (146.5 × 165.4 cm) Overall: 59 1/4 × 66 1/2 in. (150.5 × 165.4 cm) Overall: 59 1/4 × 66 1/2 in. (150.5 × 165.4 cm) Overall: 59 1/4 × 66 1/2 in. (150.5 × 165.4 cm) Overall: 59 1/4 × 66 1/2 in. (150.5 × 165.4 cm) (168.9 cm)

In "Rough Waves", Ogata Kôrin adjusts the distance precisely; the work first attracts, then forces you to slow down. Ogata Kôrin gives "Rough Waves" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The "Rough Waves" technique favors line, flat areas and precious details; it requires a closer reading than oil on canvas. The official benchmarks of "Rough Waves" - ca. 1704-9; Two-panel folding screen; ink, color, and gold leaf on paper; Image: 57 11/16 × 65 1/8 in. (146.5 × 165.4 cm) Overall: 59 1/4 × 66 1/8 in. (146.5 × 165.4 cm) Overall: 59 1/4 × 66 1/8 in. (146.5 × 165.4 cm) Overall: 57 11/16 × 65 1/8 in. (146.5 × 165.4 cm) Overall: 59 1/4 × 66 1/8 in. (146.5 × 165.4 cm) Overall: 57 11/16 × 65 1/8 in. (146.5 × 165.4 cm) Overall: 59 1/4 × 66 1/8 in. (146.5 × 165.4 cm) (244-9; Two

See the museum notice →
Night-Shining White, painting by Han Gan at the Metropolitan Museum of Art #100
Han Gan

Night-Shining White

Dateca. 750CollectionMetropolitan Museum of ArtFormatImage: 12 1/8 x 13 3/8 in. (30.8 x 34 cm) Overall with mounting: 14 in. x 37 ft. 5 1/8 in. (35.4 cm x 11.4 m)

The title "Night-Shining White" announces the motif, but Han Gan adds a visual structure that explains its lasting presence in the Met galleries. Han Gan gives "Night-Shining White" a precise identity through drawing, color and the way of distributing attention within the frame. The "Night-Shining White" technique favors line, flat areas and precious details; it requires closer reading than oil on canvas. The official "Night-Shining White" landmarks - ca. 750; Handscroll; ink on paper; Image: 12 1/8 x 13 3/8 in. (30.8 x 34 cm) Overall with mounting: 14 in. x 37 ft. 5 1/8 in. (350; Handscroll; ink on paper; Image: 12 1/8 x 13 3/8 in. (30.8 x 34 cm) Overall with mounting: 14 in. x 37 ft. 5 1/8 in. (350; Handscroll; ink on paper; The official markers of "Night-Shining White" - ca. 750; Handscroll; ink on paper; Image: 12 1/8 x 13 3/8 in. (30.8 x 34 cm) Overall with mounting: 14 in. x 37 ft. 5 1/8 in. (350; Handscroll; ink on paper; Image: 12 1/8 x 13 3/8 in. (30.8 x 34 cm) Overall with mounting: 14 in. x 37 ft

See the museum notice →

What the ranking reveals

The Met doesn't have a masterpiece, it has several floors

The ranking first favors global notoriety and historical importance, then balances the schools, periods, formats and functions of painting.

01

Fame has many faces

A national icon by Leutze, a portrait by Sargent and a room by Vermeer do not tell the same story, but each has become a gateway to the museum.

02

Donors designed the galleries

Havemeyer, Annenberg, Wolfe and many other private collections have given the Met its most spectacular ensembles.

03

A collection remains alive

Attributions, restorations, hangings and research constantly modify the way of reading works that we thought we knew by heart.

The Met in five dates

Five landmarks before entering the galleries

1870Found an encyclopedic museum

The Metropolitan Museum of Art was born with the ambition of making art accessible to the American public.

1880Moving to Fifth Avenue

The museum opened its Central Park building, then expanded it until giving the word wing an almost geographical meaning.

1917-1929Welcome major collections

Donations and legacies quickly strengthened European and American paintings.

1950-1990Expand stories

New wings, acquisitions and research give more space to world traditions and modernity.

TodayHang up again to tell better

The Met renews its galleries and readings; even famous paintings change neighbors and sometimes meaning.

The museum in depth

How to classify an encyclopedic museum without losing the plan?

The first places combine world notoriety, historical importance and emblematic role in the collection. Washington Crossing the Delaware, Madame.

The ranking is not limited to the most reproduced works. It preserves the paintings that explain the Met's encyclopedic identity: Italian Renaissance, Dutch Golden Age, Spain, France, American painting, Persian, Indian, Chinese and Japanese traditions.

Each work is verified in the API and the official notice of the Metropolitan Museum. The title, artist, date, technique, dimensions and image must match; duplicate identity and visuals are refused before publication.

The images come from the Met's Open Access. They are displayed in full with object-fit container, including for narrow portraits and large horizontal formats, because a monumental painting deserves better than an involuntary haircut.

After the introduction, the visit goes directly to the hundred paintings, one work per row. No filter or slideshow interrupts the classification.

Four visit keys

How to look at a hundred paintings without mixing everything up

A useful classification must remain readable: looking at the date, function, provenance and technique allows you to go from a medieval Virgin to Van Gogh without confusing speed and haste.

Date

Locate before comparing

Two portraits separated by three centuries can share a pose, but not the same social world nor the same relationship with the viewer.

Function

Ask why the work exists

Devotion, political command, private decoration, study or modern manifesto profoundly change the way of reading a painting.

Technique

Look at the material

Tempera, oil, ink, gold and opaque watercolor produce surfaces whose digital reproduction should not erase the differences.

Gallery

Observe the neighborhoods

At the Met, a work dialogues with its department, its hanging and the architecture; the museum also writes with walls.

Notices, catalogs and research

Continue the visit after number 100

The Metropolitan Museum's records, its Masterpiece Paintings collection, the Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History and the MetPublications catalogs allow you to check dates, techniques, dimensions, provenances and restorations.

Frequently asked questions

The Met without an accordion-folded plan

Some answers to prepare for the visit, understand the classification and find the works in the collection.

What is the most famous painting in the Metropolitan Museum?

Washington Crossing the Delaware by Emanuel Leutze, Madame X by Sargent, the Van Goghs and the Vermeers are among the most famous images. The choice also depends on the period and the school you come to see.

How many paintings does the Met have?

The Met maintains thousands of paintings spread across several departments. This Top 100 is an editorial selection, not the complete inventory of the collection.

Are all these works on permanent display?

No. The hangings change, some works travel or are kept in reserve. The official Met notice often indicates whether a painting is currently visible and in which gallery.

Why are Asian paintings found in this ranking?

The Metropolitan Museum is encyclopedic. Its collections of Chinese, Japanese, Indian and Persian painting are essential; excluding them would give an artificially narrow image of the museum.

Can images be reused?

The images used here are marked as Open Access and public domain by the Met. The notice of each work remains the reference for checking the conditions and downloading the official file.

Where to see the Met's European paintings?

Much of it is in the European painting galleries at Fifth Avenue. Gallery numbers and hangings may change; consult the map and museum instructions on the day of the visit.

How long does it take to see this Top 100 at the museum?

Several hours at least, and probably more if you really look. The Met rewards breaks; it especially sanctions shoes that are too optimistic.

How is this Top 100 ranked?

The front rows combine international notoriety, historical importance and masterpiece status in the collection. The suite balances periods, schools and traditions without duplication of work or image.

The hundredth painting has passed, the museum continues behind the next door

One hundred paintings later, the Met is still not finished

This classification spans several centuries without claiming to reduce the Metropolitan Museum to a definitive podium. The first works are the icons that we come to recognize; the following ones give the museum its depth, its contradictions and its changes of scale. The best Top 100 ultimately remains the one that makes you want to leave the list, look up at the original and accept that a visit to the Met almost always exceeds the planned time.

Explore Metropolitan Museum of Art reproductions

0 comments

Leave a comment

Please note that comments must be approved before they are published.